Manohar v. State by
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court granted interim custody of a seized vehicle to the petitioner, setting aside the lower court's order dismissing the prayer, subject to the execution of a bond and filing of an undertaking.
What did the court decide?
Interim custody of the vehicle granted under conditions including execution of a bond for Rs.2,00,000/- and undertaking not to dispose of the vehicle.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 09.11.2021
CORAM:
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA
CRL.R.C.No.731 of 2021
Manohar,
S/o, Elumalai
...Petitioner
Versus
State By, The Inspector of Police, C1-Uthukottai Police Station, Thiruvallore District. ...Respondent
PRAYER: Criminal Revision Petition filed under Section 397 & 401 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, to set aside the order passed in Crl.M.P.No.1694 of 2021 dated 29.07.2021 on the file of the District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate, Uthukottai and further direct the respondents to return the petitioner's vehicle “Mahindra Scorpio Car” “ White Colour” bearing Registration Number TN 20 BQ 0002” seized in Crime No.318 of 2021 on the file of the respondent police.
For Petitioner : Mr.S.Silambuselvan
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether interim custody of the seized vehicle should be granted pending initiatio of confiscation proceedings.
Whether the order dismissing the interim custody petition should be set aside.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Manohar
- respondent
State By The Inspector of Police, C1-Uthukottai Police Station, Thiruvallore District
Coram
A.D. Jagadish Chandira
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court