Dismissed

Blue Cross of India v. Premkumar

Madras HC10 Nov 2021CRL RC/654/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Indian High Court dismissed a criminal revision filed by the Blue Cross of India challenging an order granting interim custody of roosters to the accused. The court held the matter infructuous as the underlying case concluded in conviction and the animals were returned to the petitioner.

What did the court decide?

Criminal revision stands dismissed as infructuous; connected miscellaneous petition closed.

Blue Cross of India Vs Premkumar — Narcotics (NDPS) | Madras HC (2021)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED : 10.11.2021

¶3

CORAM

¶4

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTIC E A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA

¶5

Crl.RC.No.654 of 2020 and MP.No.4825 of 2020

¶6

Blue Cross of India Rep by its Honorary Secretary, Ms.Saraswathi Haksan A Society registered under Societies Act, Having its registered office at No.1, Eldams Road, Chennai – 600 018.

¶7

...Petitioner

¶8

Vs.

¶9

Prem Kumar 2. The Inspector of Police, F3, Nungambakkam Police Station, Chennai. (Cr.No.456 of 2020) ....Respondents

¶10

PRAYER: Criminal Revision is filed under Sections 397 r/w.401 of Criminal Procedure Code to call for the records in Email MP.No.878 of 2020 in Cr.No.456 of 2020 on the file of the Learned Metropolitan Magistrate, XIV, Egmore and set aside the same.

¶11

For Petitioner : Mr.S.Anand

¶12

For Respondents : Mr.E.Raj Tilak, APP for R2. R1 – No appearance.

¶13

ORDER

¶14

(The case has been heard through video conference)

¶15

When the matter is taken up today, the learned Additional Public Prosecutor submitted that the revision has been filed against the order of granting interim custody of 13roosters to the accused in Cr.No.456 of 2020 registered by the respondent for the offence under sections 188, 269 and 11 (1)(n) of the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act, 1960. Subsequent to the order, the respondent have filed the final report in the case and the case was taken up trial in CC.No.4187 of 2020 on the file of the XIV Metropolitan Magistrate, Egmore, Chennai.

¶16

The case has ended in conviction and thereafter the https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ accused have returned the roosters to the custody of the Court

¶17

and they have been handed over to the petitioner/Blue Cross of India and he would submit that nothing survives for adjudication in this criminal revision.

¶18

Mr.S.Anand, learned counsel representing the petitioner would submit that the roosters are now under the custody of the petitioner/Blue Cross of India.

¶19

Recording the same, the criminal revision stands dismissed as infructuous. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

¶20

Sd/-

¶21

Assistant Registrar (CS-VII)

¶22

//True Copy//

¶23

Sub Assistant Registrar

¶24

Tsh

¶25

¶26

1.The XIV Metropolitan Magistrate, Egmore, Chennai.

¶27

2.The Inspector of Police, F3, Nungambakkam Police Station, Chennai.

¶28

3.The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras-104.

¶29

Crl.RC.No.654 of 2020

¶30

PCH (CO) PR (30/11/2021)

¶31

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Blue Cross of India v. Premkumar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Blue Cross of India v. Premkumar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Manohar Vs State by

Sathish @ Aruppu Sathish Vs the Executive Magistrate

Latha @ Shree Latha Vs D.Surendran

R.Selva Karthi Vs K.Vanitha

Elangovan Vs the State Rep.by

D.Prabhu Vs T.L.Parthasarathy Sarathy