Single judge recalled a dated 11.08.2021 order dismissing a criminal revision over a discharge. The court directed counsel to explain the employment status of a second respondent and scheduled arguments for one week later.
Order dated 11.08.2021 recalled; matter postponed for one week for further arguments.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Crl.R.C.No.124 of 2017
Crl.R.C.No.124 of 2017 and Crl.M.P.No.1320 of 2017
RMT.TEEKAA RAMAN, J.
By an order dated 11.08.2021, this Court has pronounced the order in the open Court, whereby, this Criminal Revision Case was dismissed in respect of discharge of one of the accused. Before signing in the order, this Court has entertained a doubt with regard to reasoning given in paragraph No.6. Accordingly, order passed in Crl.R.C.No.124 of 2017, dated 11.08.2021 stands recalled.
2.Both the counsels are directed to clarify the position as to the document produced by the second respondent herein viz., Manoharan that he was working as a Chief Loco Inspector under Railway Chief Crew Controller, Yelagiri.
2.For further arguments post the matter after one week.
23.08.2021
dua
1/2
Crl.R.C.No.124 of 2017
RMT.TEEKAA RAMAN, J.
dua
Crl.R.C.No.124 of 2017
and
Crl.M.P.No.1320 of 2017
23.08.2021
2/2
TEEKAA RAMAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
