Dismissed

V.Anandhababu, M/a 40 Years, v. the Inspector of Police

Madras HC10 Aug 2021CRL RC/769/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court dismissed a criminal revision filed by an accused to set aside an order dismissing his complaint under Section 309 Cr.P.C. Finding that the police had filed a charge sheet under IPC Section 306, the Court held nothing survived for adjudication in the revision.

What did the court decide?

The criminal revision is dismissed as infructuous; the connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

V.Anandhababu, M/a 40 Years, Vs the Inspector of Police — Corruption | Madras HC (2021)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED : 10.08.2021

¶3

CORAM:

¶4

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RMT.TEEKAA RAMAN

¶5

Crl.R.C.No.769 of 2018 and Crl.M.P.No.8792 of 2018

V. Anandhababu

.. Petitioner

Vs.

The Inspector of Police, Periyanaickkenpalayam Police Station. Crime No.894 of 2011 .. Respondent

¶10

PRAYER : Petition filed under Section 397 and 401 of the Criminal Procedure Code, to set aside the order dated 17.01.2018 passed in CMP.No.642 of 2016 in S.C.No.46 of 2015 on the file of I Additional Subordinate Judge, Coimbatore.

¶11

For Petitioner : Mr. R. Nalliyappan

¶12

For Respondent : Mr. R. Vinoth Raja, Government Advocate

¶13

O R D E R

¶14

The matter is heard through "Video Conference".

¶15

The revision petitioner is the accused in S.C.No.46 of 2015, before the I Additional Sub Court, Coimbatore. When the Sessions case was in progress, the petitioner/accused filed CMP.No.642/2016, under Section 309 of Cr.P.C., and the same was dismissed. Hence, the revision.

¶16

3. The learned Government Advocate (Crl.side) for the respondent submitted that pending disposal of the revision petition, the respondent/police had investigated the case in Crime No.893/2013 and filed charge sheet for the alleged offence under Section 306 of IPC and the same was numbered as P.R.C.No.30/2015 and ready for committal.

¶17

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶18

4. Hence, I find nothing survives in the matter for adjudication. It is open to the petitioner to file appropriate application for appropriate relief, in accordance with law.

¶19

5. Accordingly, this criminal revision is dismissed as

¶20

infurutuous. consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

¶21

Sd/-

¶22

Assistant Registrar(CS III)

¶23

//True Copy//

¶24

Sub Assistant Registrar

¶25

¶26

¶27

The I Additional Subordinate Judge, Coimbatore.

¶28

The Inspector of Police, Periyanaickkenpalayam Police Station, Coimbatore.

¶29

The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras.

¶30

Crl.R.C.No.769 of 2018 and Crl.M.P.No.8792 of 2018

¶31

LN(CO)

¶32

HS(31/08/2021)

¶33

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

V.Anandhababu, M/a 40 Years, v. the Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

V.Anandhababu, M/a 40 Years, v. the Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

S.Gopu, Aged About 31 Years Vs State Rep by

A.Venkatramani Vs Vaikundam Rubber Company Ltd.

M. Meeran, Vs Habeeb Nisha

K.Kalaesha, Aged 37 Years, Vs Ashokan, Aged 50 Years

Sivadas @ Kovan Vs the Inspector of Police

R.Prakash Vs Karunakaran