Petitioner filed a criminal revision under Sections 397 and 401 CPC seeking to call for records. No one appeared on behalf of the petitioner on two consecutive dates. The petition was dismissed for default due to non-appearance.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 11.08.2021
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE RMT.TEEKAA RAMAN
Crl.R.C.No.1116 of 2015
Babu.C
.. Vs ..
Inspector of Police, Puduchathiram Police Station, Cuddalore District
...Respondent
Prayer :-
Criminal Revision filed under Sections 397 and 401 of the Criminal Procedure Code, to call for the records in C.C.No.179 of 2006, District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Parangipettai for examining the correctness, legality or propriety of the finding on rash and negligent act of revision petitioner and allow this revision petition by dismissing C.A.No.27 of 2015 on the file of II Additional Sessions Judge, Chidambaram.
For Petitioner : No appearance
O R D E R
When the matter was listed on 10.08.2021, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner. Therefore, the matter was ordered to be listed on 11.08.2021 under the caption “for dismissal”. Even today i.e. 11.08.2021, no one appeared on behalf of the petitioner. The very same state of affairs continues till date.
Sd/Assistant Registrar(CS-V)
Sub Assistant Registrar
nvi
To
Copy to:-
The Section Officer, Criminal Section (Records) High Court Madras.
Crl.R.C.No.1116 of 2015
LN(CO) CT(27/08/2021)
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Babu.C
Inspector of Police, Puduchathiram Police Station, Cuddalore District
RMT Teekaa Raman
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
