Disposed

Manimaran v. The Inspector of Police

Madras HC22 Jul 2021CRL OP(MD)/9610/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In an anticipatory bail petition, the Madras High Court directed the police not to arrest the petitioner pending case registration under Section 438 Cr.P.C and to cooperate with the investigation. The petitioner is permitted to file a fresh petition if a case is registered.

What did the court decide?

Directed police not to arrest petitioner pending case registration; directed petitioner to cooperate with investigation.

Manimaran Vs The Inspector of Police — Bail and Remand | Madras HC (2021)

¶1

CRL OP(MD)No.9610 of 2021

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

( Criminal Jurisdiction )

¶4

Date : 22/07/2021

¶5

PRESENT

¶6

The Hon`ble Mr.Justice SATHI KUMAR SUKUMARA KURUP

¶7

CRL OP(MD)No.9610 of 2021

¶8

Manimaran ... Petitioner/Accused Rank not known

¶9

¶10

State represented by, The Inspector of Police, Town Police Station, Devakottai, Sivagangai District.

¶11

Crime No.Not Known of 2021 ... Respondent/Complainant

¶12

For Petitioner : Mr.A.Muralikumar, Advocate

¶13

For Respondent : Mr.M.Muthumanikkam,

¶14

Government Advocate(Crl.side)

¶15

PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec.438 of Cr.P.C

¶16

PRAYER :-For Anticipatory Bail in Crime No.Not Known of 2021 on the file of the respondent Police.

¶17

ORDER : The Court made the following order :-

¶18

The petitioner, who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 294(b), 323, 506(i) IPC and Section 4 of the Women Harassment Act in Crime No.Not Known of 2021, seeks anticipatory bail.

¶19

2.Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned Government Advocate(Crl.side) appearing for the respondent police submitted that based on the complaint preferred by the defacto complainant, an enquiry was initiated in C.S.R.No.260 of 2021 and the same is pending.

¶20

3.In view of the above submission, the respondent police is directed not to arrest the petitioner till the registration of case. The petitioner is directed to co-operate with the investigation. If the case is registered, the petitioner is at liberty to file a fresh https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ petition seeking the appropriate relief.

¶21

1/2

¶22

CRL OP(MD)No.9610 of 2021

¶23

4.With the above observations, this criminal original petition is disposed of.

¶24

sd/-

¶25

22/07/2021 / TRUE COPY /

¶26

Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court,

¶27

Madurai - 625 023.

¶28

Note : In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate/litigant concerned.

¶29

¶30

1.THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE,

¶31

TOWN POLICE STATION, DEVAKOTTAI, SIVAGANGAI DISTRICT.

¶32

2.THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

¶33

ORDER

¶34

¶35

CRL OP(MD) No.9610 of 2021 Date :22/07/2021 GNS

¶36

RT/JM/SAR-III/27.07.2021/2P/3C

¶37

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶38

2/2

Manimaran v. The Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Manimaran v. The Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Palani Vs the Inspector of Police

C.Kannan, Vs P.Manimegalai

Mrs. Iyyammal Vs the Sub Inspector of Police

R. Kannan Vs The inspector of POlice

Pothiraj Vs The Inspector of Police

Rajendra Prasad Vs The Inspector of Police