C.Kannan, v. P.Manimegalai
Case brief
What is this about?
The revision petition was dismissed as abated because the petitioner was reported dead, based on a filed memo and death certificate submitted by his counsel via virtual mode.
What did the court decide?
The Criminal Revision Case is dismissed as abated due to the death of the petitioner.
What the court decided
Crl.R.C.(MD) No.248 of 2017
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 20.07.2021 CORAM :
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE SATHI KUMAR SUKUMARA KURUP Crl.R.C.(MD) No.248 of 2017 and Crl.M.P.(MD) Nos.2177 and 2178 of 2017
C.Kannan
... Petitioner/Accused
vs.
P.Manimegalai ... Respondent/Complainant
Prayer:- This Criminal Revision Case filed under Section 397(1) r/w 401 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, to call for the records pertaining to the judgment in C.A.No.8 of 2016 on the file of the 1st Additional District Judge (PCR), Trichirappalli, dated 06.01.2017, confirming the conviction and sentence to undergo rigorous imprisonment for one year and also to pay fine of Rs.5,000/-, in default, to undergo simple imprisonment for two months imposed by the judgment dated 05.02.2016 in S.T.C.No.70 of 2013 on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Manaparai, Trichy and set aside the same.
For Petitioner : Mr.T.A.Ebinezer For Respondent : No appearance
ORDER
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
C.Kannan
- respondent
P.Manimegalai
Coram
Sathi Kumar Sukumara Kurup
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court