Dismissed

Sridhar v. State Rep by

Madras HC15 Apr 2021CRL OP/6570/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This court disposed of a petition for anticipatory bail under Section 438 CrPC. Since anticipatory bail had already been granted to the petitioner in the same crime number via a previous order, the court declined to grant fresh bail but extended the period to comply with prior conditions.

What did the court decide?

Extension of two weeks to comply with conditions imposed in the order dated 03.02.2020; petition dismissed.

Sridhar Vs State Rep by — Anticipatory Bail | Madras HC (2021)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

( Criminal Jurisdiction )

¶3

Thursday, the Fifteenth day of April Two Thousand Twenty One

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

The Hon`ble Mr Justice M.DHANDAPANI

¶6

CRIMINAL ORIGINAL PETITION No.6570 of 2021

¶7

SRIDHAR [ PETITIONER / ACCUSED ]

¶8

STATE REP BY [ RESPONDENT ] THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, PERUGAVAZHAVANTHAN POLICE STATION, THIRUVARUR DISTRICT. CR.NO.119/2019.

¶9

For Petitioner : M/S.P.SUNDARA RAJAN Advocate

¶10

For Respondent : M/S.KRITIKA KAMAL P. Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side)

¶11

PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C.

¶12

ORDER : The Court Made the following order :-

¶13

The petitioner who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offence under Sections 147, 148, 452, 324, 363, 307 and 506(ii) of I.P.C. in Cr.No.119 of 2019 on the file of the respondent police, seeks anticipatory bail.

¶14

2.When the matter was taken up for consideration, the learned Government Advovate submitted that this Court vide order dated 03.02.2020 made in Crl.O.P.No.291 of 2020 has granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner in the very same crime number and also produced a copy of the said order.

¶15

3.Since anticipatory bail has already been granted to the petitioner in the very same crime number, this Court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner in this petition. However, this Court grants further period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, to the petitioner, to comply with the conditions imposed in the order dated 03.02.2020 made in Crl.O.P.No.291 of 2020.

¶16

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶17

4.This criminal original petition is accordingly disposed of.

¶18

-sd/15/04/2021

¶19

This order, on being produced, be punctually observed and carried into execution by all concerned

¶20

TRUE COPY

¶21

Sub-Assistant Registrar (Statistics/C.S.)
High Court, Madras - 600 104.
TO
1 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE,
PERUGAVAZHAVANTHAN POLICE STATION,
THIRUVARUR DISTRICT.
2 THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
HIGH COURT, MADRAS.
+1 CC to M/S.P.SUNDARA RAJAN Advocate on payment of necessary
charges SR.NO.4723
CRL OP.6570/2021
Date :15/04/2021
TA-19/04/2021

¶22

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Sridhar v. State Rep by

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sridhar v. State Rep by

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

A.Zakir Hussian Vs State Rep.by

Logu @ Loganathan Vs State Rep.by

K.Arun Vs the State Rep by

Vs

S.Paul Asir Vs Mr. G.Sanmugavel

R.Madhusoodhanan Pillai Vs Sanjeev Gupta