Dismissed

Logu @ Loganathan v. State Rep.by

Madras HC9 Apr 2021CRL OP/5925/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Madras High Court dismissed a bail application under Section 439 CrPC. The petitioner, arrested for alleged offences including attempts to murder under IPC Section 307, sought bail. The court denied bail due to the petitioner's history of seven previous cases, deeming him not suitable for release.

What did the court decide?

Bail application dismissed; petitioner remained in judicial custody.

Logu @ Loganathan Vs State Rep.by — Bail and Remand | Madras HC (2021)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

( Criminal Jurisdiction )

¶3

Friday, the Ninth day of April Two Thousand Twenty One

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

The Hon`ble Mr Justice M.DHANDAPANI

¶6

CRIMINAL ORIGINAL PETITION No.5925 of 2021

¶7

LOGU @ LOGANATHAN [ PETITIONER / ACCUSED ]

¶8

¶9

STATE REP.BY [ RESPONDENT ] THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, SANKARAPURAM POLICE STATION, VILLUPURAM DISTRICT.

¶10

CR.NO.146 OF 2021.

¶11

For Petitioner : M/S. U.YUVARAJ Advocate

¶12

For Respondent : Mrs.M.Prabhavathi Additional Public Prosecutor

¶13

PETITION FOR BAIL 439 Cr.P.C.

¶14

ORDER : The Court Made the following order :-

¶15

The petitioner, who was arrested on 03.03.2021 and remanded to judicial custody for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 341, 294(b), 323 and 307 of IPC in Crime No.146 of 2021, on the file of the respondent police, seeks bail.

¶16

2.The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner due to previous enmity attacked the defacto complainant by using iron rod and knife and caused injuries to him. Hence, the complaint.

¶17

3.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution and he has been falsely implicated in this case. Hence, he prays for grant of bail to the petitioner.

¶18

4.The learned Additional Public Prosecutor submits that there are seven previous cases against the petitioner. Hence, he opposed for grant of bail to the petitioner.

¶19

Taking into consideration and facts of the case and the petitioner is having seven previous cases, this Court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

¶20

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶21

6.Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed.

¶22

-sd/09/04/2021 This order, on being produced, be punctually observed and carried into execution by all concerned

¶23

TRUE COPY

¶24

Sub-Assistant Registrar (Statistics/C.S.)
High Court, Madras - 600 104.
TO
1 THE SUPERINTENDENT,
CENTRAL PRISON, PUZHAL,
CHENNAI
2 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE,
SANKARAPURAM POLICE STATION,
VILLUPURAM DISTRICT.
3 THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
HIGH COURT, MADRAS.
CC to M/S. U.YUVARAJ Advocate on payment of necessary charges
CRL OP.5925/2021
Date :09/04/2021
RVR 11/05/2021

¶25

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Logu @ Loganathan v. State Rep.by

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Logu @ Loganathan v. State Rep.by

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Kiran Vs State Rep by

N.Muralidharan Vs State Rep by

M.Chellaiah Vs State Rep by

Venkata Saravanan @ Chathurvedhi Samiyar Vs the Inspector of Police

Dharuman Vs State by

Dhanapal Chandrasekar Vs the State