Dismissed

A.M.Srikanth Kalingarayar v. the Inspector of Police

Madras HC8 Dec 2021CRL OP/30524/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This order records the dismissal of two petitions as withdrawn by the petitioners' counsel. The High Court of Madras closed the connected miscellaneous petition upon the submission of withdrawal, without addressing any substantive legal grounds or quashing impugned orders.

What did the court decide?

The Criminal Original Petitions were dismissed as withdrawn; the connected Miscellaneous Petition was closed.

A.M.Srikanth Kalingarayar Vs the Inspector of Police — Writ and Judicial Review | Madras HC (2021)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

( Criminal Jurisdiction )

¶3

Wednesday, the Eighth day of December Two Thousand Twenty One

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

The Hon`ble Mrs Justice T.V.THAMILSELVI

¶6

CRIMINAL ORIGINAL PETITION No.30524 of 2019

¶7

AND

¶8

CRL.MP.NO.16539 of 2019

¶9

1 A.M.SRIKANTH KALINGARAYAR [ PETITIONERS/ ACCUSED ]

¶10

2 A.MURALIKRISHNA KALINGARAYAR

¶11

3 M.LATHA

¶12

¶13

1 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE [ RESPONDENTS/COMPLAINANT ] ALL WOMEN POLICE STATION-EAST, COIMBATORE CITY, (CR.NO.7 OF 2017)

¶14

2 S.HEMALATHA

¶15

Petitions praying that in the circumstances stated therein the High Court will be pleased to

¶16

(i)Call for the records in the charge sheet in C C.NO.33 of 2019 pending on the file of the Additional Mahila Court Coimbatore and quash the CRL.OP.NO.30524/2019.

¶17

(ii)Stay the further proceedings in the charge sheet filed in CC NO 33 of 2019 against the Crime No 07 of 2017 pending this petition on the file of the Additional Mahila Court Coimbatore and pass such further or other orders CRL.MP.NO.16539/2019.

¶18

Order : These petitions coming on for orders upon perusing the petitions and upon hearing the arguments of M/S.N.STALIN Advocate for the petitioners and of MR.A.GOKULAKRISHNAN Additional Public Prosecutor on behalf of the 1^st Respondent the court made the following order:-

¶19

When the matter is taken up for hearing today, the learned Counsel for the petitioners would seek permission of this Court to withdraw the petition. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶20

In view of the above submission made by the learned Counsel for the petitioners, the Criminal Original Petition stands dismissed as withdrawn. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed.

¶21

-sd/-

¶22

08/12/2021

¶23

This order, on being produced, be punctually observed and carried into execution by all concerned

¶24

TRUE COPY

¶25

Sub-Assistant Registrar (Statistics/C.S.) High Court, Madras - 600 104.

¶26

¶27

1 THE ADDITIONAL MAHILA COURT COIMBATORE.

¶28

2 THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT, MADRAS.

¶29

3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, ALL WOMEN POLICE STATION-EAST, COIMBATORE DISTRICT.

¶30

CC to M/S.N.STALIN Advocate on payment of necessary charges

CRL OP.30524/2019

AND

CRL.MP.16539/2019

Date :08/12/2021

CSK 15/12/2021

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

A.M.Srikanth Kalingarayar v. the Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

A.M.Srikanth Kalingarayar v. the Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M.Renuka Vs State Rep by

B.Surendher Vs State Rep by

R.Jayakanthan Vs State Rep by

G.Jegan Vs State by

K.Senthil Prabu Vs the State Rep by Its

C.Kamal Vs Inspector of Police