Petitioner sought anticipatory bail under Section 438 Cr.P.C. Learned counsel moved to withdraw the petition. Court recorded the withdrawal and dismissed the criminal original petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
( Criminal Jurisdiction )
Wednesday, the Eighth day of December Two Thousand Twenty One
PRESENT
The Hon`ble Mrs Justice T.V. THAMILSELVI
CRIMINAL ORIGINAL PETITION No.22813 of 2021
1 C.KAMAL [ PETITIONERS / ACCUSED ]
2 S.KAVITHA
Vs
INSPECTOR OF POLICE [ RESPONDENT ] DISTRICT CRIME BRANCH, TIRUVANNAMALAI DISTRICT. CR.NO. 12 OF 2019.
For Petitioner : M/S. B.KOTESWARA RAO Advocate
For Respondent : MR.A.GOKULAKRISHNAN, ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C.
ORDER : The Court Made the following order :-
The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this petition.
-sd/-
08/12/2021
This order, on being produced, be punctually observed and carried into execution by all concerned
TRUE COPY
Sub-Assistant Registrar (Statistics/C.S.) High Court, Madras - 600 104.
TO
1 INSPECTOR OF POLICE DISTRICT CRIME BRANCH, TIRUVANNAMALAI DISTRICT.
2 THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT, MADRAS.
CC to M/S. B.KOTESWARA RAO Advocate on payment of necessary charges
CRL OP.22813/2021
Date :08/12/2021
RVR 14/12/2021
C.KAMAL
S.KAVITHA
INSPECTOR OF POLICE
T.V. THAMILSELVI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
