K.Senthil Prabu v. the State Rep by Its
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court relaxed condition 6(b) of a prior bail order permitting the petitioner to appear for interrogation as required by summons, while noting compliance with existing conditions.
What did the court decide?
Condition 6(b) of the bail order is relaxed; petitioner must appear for interrogation on summons.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
( Criminal Jurisdiction )
Wednesday, the Eighth day of December Two Thousand Twenty One
PRESENT
The Hon`ble Mrs Justice T.V.THAMILSELVI
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS PETITION No.13042 of 2021
IN CRL OP.20557/2021
1 K.SENTHIL PRABU
[ PETITIONERS ]
2 S.KUMAR
Vs
THE STATE REP BY ITS THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, ANUPPARPALAYAM POLICE STATION, TIRUPPUR CITY. (CRIME NO.3804/2021)
[ RESPONDENT ]
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the conditions imposed on the petitioner in a prior bail order should be relaxed.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
K.Senthil Prabu
- petitioner
S.Kumar
- respondent
The State Rep by its the Inspector of Police, Anupparpalayam Police Station, Tiruppur City
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court