Allowed

S.Sathish v. State Rep by

Madras HC17 Feb 2021CRL OP/3033/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Madras High Court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner in a criminal counter case under Section 438 Cr.P.C., imposing conditions for police reporting, non-tampering, and ensuring presence to avoid dismissal or fresh FIR.

What did the court decide?

Release on bail within fifteen days subject to execution of bond with sureties and compliance with specific conditions regarding reporting and non-interference.

S.Sathish Vs State Rep by — Bail and Remand | Madras HC (2021)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 17.02.2021 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.BHARATHIDASAN Crl.O.P.No.3033 of 2021

¶2

S.Sathish ... Petitioner

¶3

Vs. The State by The Inspector of Police, Roshanai Police Station, Villupuram District. (Crime No.46 of 2021) ... Respondent

¶4

Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C. to enlarge the petitioner on bail in the event of his arrest in Crime No.46 of 2021 pending investigation on the file of the respondent police.

¶5

For Petitioner : Mr.S.Anburaja For Respondent : Mr. S.Karthikeyan, Additional Public Prosecutor

¶6

O R D E R

¶7

(The case has been heard through video conference)

¶8

The petitioner who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences publishable under Sections 294 (b), 324, 307 and 506(ii) of IPC in Crime No.46 of 2021 on the file of the respondent police, seeks anticipatory bail.

¶9

The case of the prosecution is that there was a previous enmity between the petitioner and defacto complainant, as a result of which , the petitioner along with other accused person had attacked the defacto complainant and caused injuries. Hence, the complaint was registered.

¶10

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶11

The learned Counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is an innocent person and he has not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution and a false case has been foisted against him. He would further submit that the petitioner has given a complaint before the respondent police in Crime No.47 of 2021 against the defacto complainant and there is a case in counter. Hence, he prays for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

¶12

The learned Additional Public Prosecutor submitted that it is a case in counter case in Crime Nos.46 & 47 of 2021 has been registered by the respondent police. He further submitted that there are no previous cases pending as against the petitioner. He would further submit that the injured person has been discharged from the hospital. However, he opposed for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

¶13

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and that it is a case in counter and the injured person has been discharged from the hospital, this court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner with certain conditions.

¶14

Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on his appearance, within a period of fifteen days from the date on which the order copy made ready, before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.I, Tindivanam,, on condition that the petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent police or the police officer who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned, failing which this petition for anticipatory bail shall stand dismissed and on further condition that:

¶15

[a] the petitioner and the sureties shall affix his photographs and Left Thumb Impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank pass Book to ensure their identity.

¶16

[b] the petitioner shall report before the respondent Police as and when required for interrogation.

¶17

[c] the petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial.

¶18

[d] the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial.

¶19

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶20

[e] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560].

¶21

[f] If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 229A IPC.

¶22

With the above directions, this Criminal Original Petition is ordered. -sd/17/02/2021 This order, on being produced, be punctually observed and carried into execution by all concerned TRUE COPY Sub-Assistant Registrar (Statistics/C.S.) High Court, Madras - 600 104. TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.I, TINDIVANAM. 2 THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE VILLUPURAM [FOR INFORMATION] 3 THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT, MADRAS. 4 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, ROSHANI POLICE STATION, VILLUPURAM DISTRICT.. +1CC to M/S.S.ANBURAJA Advocate on payment of necessary charges SR NO.1810 CRL OP.3033/2021 Date :17/02/2021 MK:25/02/2021

¶23

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

S.Sathish v. State Rep by

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

S.Sathish v. State Rep by

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

V.Parasakthi @ Athiparasakthi Vs State Rep by

M.Gnansekar Vs State Rep by

Velu Vs State Rep.by

Sakthivel Vs State Rep by

Dharvis Vs State Rep. by

Anandaraj Vs the Inspector of Police