Sakthivel v. State Rep by
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court of Madras dismissed a bail petition filed by Sakthivel for offences under various sections of the IPC due to the non-appearance and lack of representation on behalf of the petitioner.
What did the court decide?
The Criminal Original Petition for bail has been dismissed for non-prosecution.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
( Criminal Jurisdiction )
Wednesday, the Seventeenth day of February Two Thousand Twenty One
PRESENT
The Hon`ble Mr Justice V. BHARATHIDASAN
CRIMINAL ORIGINAL PETITION No.1609 of 2021
SAKTHIVEL [ PETITIONER / ACCUSED ]
Vs STATE REP BY [ RESPONDENT ] INSPECTOR OF POLICE, F-5,CHOOLAIMEDU POLICE STATION, CHENNAI.
CRIME NO.20 OF 2021
For Petitioner : NO APPEARANCE
For Respondent : M/S.M.PRABHAVATHI, Additional Public Prosecutor
ORDER : The Court Made the following order :-
The petitioner seeks bail for the offence under Section 341, 294(a), 324, 307 and 506(ii) of IPC in Crime No.20 of 2021.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to grant bail to the petitioner accused in respect of offences under Section 341, 294(a), 324, 307 and 506(ii) of IPC.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
SAKTHIVEL
- respondent
STATE REP BY INSPECTOR OF POLICE, F-5,CHOOLAIMEDU POLICE STATION, CHENNAI
Coram
V. BHARATHIDASAN
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court