Velu v. State Rep.by
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court of Madras, on a criminal original petition, granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner. The court noted the seizure of contraband and lack of prior cases. Bail was granted with conditions including daily reporting, no tampering, and no absconding.
What did the court decide?
Petitioner granted anticipatory bail subject to conditions including appearing within 15 days, reporting daily to police, executing a bond with sureties, and refraining from tampering with evidence or
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 16.02.2021
CORAM:
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE V.BHARATHIDASAN
Crl.O.P.No.2662 of 2021
Velu ... Petitioner
-Vs-
State Rep. by Station House Officer, Kadampuliyur Police Station, Cuddalore District. (Crime No.51 of 2021) ... Respondent
Prayer: Criminal Original petition filed under Section 438 of Code of Criminal Procedure praying to enlarge the Petitioner on bail in the event of his arrest in Crime No.51 of 2021 on the file of the respondent police.
For Petitioner : Mr.D.Devaraju
For Respondent : Mr.S.Karthikeyan
Additional Public Prosecutor
ORDER
The case has been heard through video conference)
The petitioner, who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offence punishable under Sections 430, 379 of IPC r/w 21(1) Mines and Minerals Act, in Crime No.51 of 2021, on the file of the respondent police, seeks anticipatory bail.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner in a case involving illegal transportation of red sand without a valid license?
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Velu
- respondent
State Rep. by Station House Officer, Kadampuliyur Police Station
Coram
V. BHARATHIDASAN
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court