Disposed

R.Sundararajan v. the Inspector of Police

Madras HC27 Aug 2021CRL OP/29852/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner sought transfer of criminal investigation to a central agency under Section 482 Cr.P.C. for substantial justice. Respondent argued investigation was completed and charge sheet filed. Court held nothing survived for adjudication, closed the petition, and granted liberty to raise grounds below.

What did the court decide?

Petition closed; liberty granted to raise grounds before the Trial Court.

R.Sundararajan Vs the Inspector of Police — Criminal Trial and Appeal | Madras HC (2021)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED : 27.08.2021

¶3

CORAM

¶4

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI

¶5

Crl.O.P.No.29852 of 2018

¶6

R.Soundararajan, S/o. Rajagopalan. ... Petitioner/Defacto Complainant

¶7

The Inspector of Police, S-15 Selaiyur Ps., Selayur, Chennai-73 2. The Commissioner of Police, Greater Chennai city police, Vepery, Chennai-600 007. 3. The Director General of Police(Law & Order), Dr. Radhakrishnan Salai, Mylapore, Chennai-600 004. 4. The Home Secretary, Government of TamilNadu, Fort St.George, Chennai-600 009. 5. The Joint Director, Central Bearue of investigation No.4 A, Rajaji Bhavan, Besant Nagar, Chennai-600 090. 6. The Thasildhar, Tambaram Taluk, Tambaram, Chennai. ...Respondents Prayer:Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., to order transfer the investigation in Cr.No.1103/2017 from the file of the 1^st respondent police to any other competent central investigation agency in order to maintain the substantial Justice to the victims of crime.

¶8

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶9

For Petitioners : Mr.J. Jaishankar

¶10

For RR1 : Mr.C.E.Pratap, Government Advocate (Crl.Side)

¶11

O R D E R

¶12

The petitioner has filed this petition seeking to order transfer the investigation in Cr.No.1103/2017 from the file of the 1^st respondent police to any other competent central investigation agency in order to maintain the substantial Justice to the victims of crime.

¶13

When the matter is taken up, learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) submitted that the investigation has been completed and charge sheet has also been filed in P.R.C.No.24/2019 before the Judicial Magistrate No.IV, Tambaram and it is pending before the Trial Court.

¶14

In view of the aforesaid submission, nothing survives for adjudication in the present petition. Accordingly, this petition is closed. However, liberty is granted to the petitioner to raise all the grounds before the Court below and the same shall be considered on its own merits and in accordance with law.

¶15

Sd/-

¶16

Assistant Registrar(CO)

¶17

//True Copy//

¶18

Sub Assistant Registrar

¶19

nhs

¶20

¶21

The Judicial Magistrate No.IV Tambaram.

¶22

The Inspector of Police, S-15 Selaiyur Ps.,

¶23

Selayur,Chennai-73

¶24

The Commissioner of Police, Greater Chennai city police, Vepery, Chennai-600 007.

¶25

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶26

The Director General of Police(Law & Order), Dr. Radhakrishnan Salai, Mylapore, Chennai-600 004.

¶27

The Home Secretary, Government of TamilNadu, Fort St.George, Chennai-600 009.

¶28

The Joint Director, Central Bearue of investigation No.4 A, Rajaji Bhavan, Besant Nagar, Chennai-600 090.

¶29

The Thasildhar, Tambaram Taluk, Tambaram, Chennai.

¶30

The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras, Chennai 600 104

¶31

Crl.O.P.No.29852 of 2018

¶32

RSI(CO) RGA(01/10/2021)

¶33

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

R.Sundararajan v. the Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

R.Sundararajan v. the Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mangilal@Mongilal Vs State Rep by

R.Balaji Vs State Rep by

M.Radhakrishnan Vs the State Rep by

Santhosh Kumar Vs the State Rep by Its

Anandan Vs State Rep by

S.Thangaraj Vs State Rep by