Allowed

R.Balaji v. State Rep by

Madras HC26 Aug 2021CRL MP/8326/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In bail proceedings, the petitioner sought relaxation of a specific bail condition regarding police appearance. The court noted the petitioner's compliance with all bail conditions to date and granted the petition to modify only the appearance requirement while keeping other terms intact until the charge sheet is filed.

What did the court decide?

Modified the appearance condition to require the petitioner to appear before the police every Monday only until the filing of the charge sheet.

R.Balaji Vs State Rep by — Bail and Remand | Madras HC (2021)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

( Criminal Jurisdiction )

¶3

Thursday, the Twenty Sixth day of August Two Thousand Twenty One

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

The Hon`ble Mr Justice M.DHANDAPANI

¶6

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS PETITION No.8326 of 2021

¶7

IN CRL.OP.NO.12056 of 2021

¶8

R.BALAJI [ PETITIONER/ACCUSED ]

¶9

¶10

STATE REP BY [ RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT ] THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, K-8, ARUMBAKKAM POLICE STATION, ARUMBAKKAM, CHENNAI-DISTRICT. (CR.NO.866/2021)

¶11

Petition praying that in the circumstances stated therein and in the affidavit filed therewith the High Court will be pleased to relax the condition(e) imposed in Crl.O.P.No.12056 of 2021 dated 15/07/2021 in Cr.No.866 of 2021 on the file of the Inspector of Police, K8 Arumbakkam Police Station, Arumbakkam, Chennai and thus render justice.

¶12

Order : This petition coming on for orders upon perusing the petition and the filed in support thereof and upon hearing the arguments of M/S.G.SARAVANAKUMAR, Advocate for the Petitioner and of MR.A.GOPINATH Govt. Advocate (Crl. Side)on behalf of the Respondent the court made the following order:-

¶13

Vide Order dated 15.07.2021, this Court had enlarged the petitioners on bail on certain conditions. This petition has been filed by the petitioners seeking relaxation of the conditions.

¶14

Learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the respondent, on instruction, submits that the petitioners have been complying with the conditions without fail.

¶15

In view of the above submission, this Court is of the considered view that the prayer as sought for by the petitioners could be acceded to.

¶16

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶17

Accordingly, the condition insofar as appearance as imposed by order dated 15.07.2021 alone stands modified and the petitioners shall appear before the respondent police every Monday till filing of charge sheet. All other conditions remain unaltered.

¶18

-sd/-

¶19

26/08/2021

¶20

This order, on being produced, be punctually observed and carried into execution by all concerned

¶21

TRUE COPY

¶22

Sub-Assistant Registrar (Statistics/C.S.) High Court, Madras - 600 104.

¶23

¶24

1 THE METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE NO.V, EGMORE,CHENNAI.

¶25

2 THE CHIEF METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE, EGMORE, CHENNAI. [FOR INFORMATION]

¶26

3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, K-8, ARUMBAKKAM POLICE STATION, ARUMBAKKAM, CHENNAI-DISTRICT.

¶27

4 THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT, MADRAS.

¶28

+1C.C. to M/S.G.SARAVANAKUMAR Advocate on payment of necessary charges SR.NO.9160

¶29

Order

¶30

¶31

CRL MP.8326/2021 in CRL.OP.12056/2021 Date :26/08/2021

¶32

From 7.2.2001 the Registry is issuing certified copies of the BAIL/Anti.BAIL Orders in this format

¶33

CSK 15/09/2021

¶34

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

R.Balaji v. State Rep by

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

R.Balaji v. State Rep by

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

V.Madhavan Vs State Rep by

Kaviyarasu Vs State Rep by

Chandrappa Vs the State Rep.by

P.Lakshmi Vs State Represented by

Sri Venkateshwara Raj Vs the Superintendent of Police

Jeganathan Tennis Missier Vs the Deputy Superintendent of Police