Disposed

Ambika v. State Rep by

Madras HC9 Mar 2021CRL OP/18982/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This court granted interim relief by directing the respondent police to complete a pending enquiry within four weeks. Pending the enquiry, the petitioners are directed not to be arrested. The petition for anticipatory bail is closed once the order is complied with.

What did the court decide?

Respondent police directed to complete enquiry within four weeks; petitioners not to be arrested till then; order directs not to arrest.

Ambika Vs State Rep by — Anticipatory Bail | Madras HC (2021)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

( Criminal Jurisdiction )

¶3

Tuesday, the Ninth day of March Two Thousand Twenty One

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

The Hon`ble Mr Justice V. BHARATHIDASAN

¶6

CRIMINAL ORIGINAL PETITION No.18982 of 2020

¶7

1 AMBIKA [ PETITIONERS / ACCUSED ]

¶8

Vs
STATE REP BY [ RESPONDENT ]

¶9

THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, ANTI LAND GRABBING SPECIAL CELL, KANCHIPURAM DISTRICT. CRIME NO.NOT KNOWN OF 2020.

¶10

For Petitioner : M/S M.SARFUDEENALIAHAMED Advocate

¶11

For Respondent : MR.K.PRABAKAR, Additional Public Prosecutor

¶12

PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C.

¶13

ORDER : The Court Made the following order :-

¶14

(This Case has been heard through Video Conferencing)

¶15

The petitioners, who apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent Police for the alleged offence punishable under Section 420 of IPC, in Crime No.Not known of 2020, seek anticipatory bail.

¶16

Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners and the learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent Police.

¶17

When the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent Police submitted that petition enquiry is pending against the petitioners in C.No.56 of 2020.

¶18

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶19

In view of the submission made by the learned Additional Public Prosecutor, the respondent Police is directed to complete the enquiry, within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order and in the enquiry, if a prima facie case is made out against the petitioners, the respondent police shall register the First Information Report, otherwise close the petition. Till then, the respondent police is directed not to arrest the petitioners.

¶20

Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition is closed.

¶21

-sd/-

¶22

09/03/2021
This order, on being produced, be punctually observed and carried
into execution by all concerned
TRUE COPY
Sub-Assistant Registrar (Statistics/C.S.)
High Court, Madras - 600 104.
TO
1 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE,
ANTI LAND GRABBING SPECIAL CELL,
KANCHIPURAM DISTRICT.
2 THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
HIGH COURT, MADRAS.
CC to M/S M.SARFUDEENALIAHAMED Advocate on payment of necessary
charges
CRL OP.18982/2020
Date :09/03/2021
TA-23/04/2021

¶23

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Ambika v. State Rep by

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ambika v. State Rep by

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Pradeep Vs State Rep by

Devan @ Devaraj Vs State Rep by

Latha Vs State Rep.by

Ramalingam Vs State Rep by

Arunan Pushpakumar Gnanamani Vs State Rep.by

R.Maha Ganesh Vs State Rep by