This review application was dismissed as the petitioner failed to demonstrate an error apparent on the face of the record regarding the order passed in W.P.No.15377 of 2019.
No costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 12.01.2022
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI
Review Application (Writ) No.176 of 2021 Against W.P.No.15377 of 2019
The Deputy Registrar / Managing Director, Tirukoilur Cooperative Urban Bank Ltd., E 25/1975 Tirukoilur – 605 757. Villupuram District.
... Petitioner/Review Applicant/ Respondent
Vs.
K.Palani ... Respondent/Respondent/Petitioner
Prayer:
Review application filed under Order 47 Rule 1 and 2 of Civil Procedure Code read with 114 of Civil Procedure Code praying to review the order passed in W.P.No.15377 of 2019 dated 24.09.2019.
Prayer in WP.No.15377 of 2019:
Petition filed under Article 226 of constitution of India directing the respondent to implement the order passed by the respondent dated 16/11/2018 consequently direct the respondent to pay arrears of the revised payscale from 13/09/1999 to till date.
For Petitioner : Mr.L.P.Shanmugasundaram
For Respondent : Mr.C.Prakasam
This review application has been filed to review the order dated 24.09.2019 passed in W.P.No.15377 of 2019.
2.This Court vide order dated 24.09.2019 made in W.P.No.15377 of 2019, issued direction to the petitioner/ respondent therein, to implement the order dated 16.11.2018, within a period of twelve weeks from the date of receipt of the copy of the order. Aggrieved by the order, the petitioner has
filed this review petition.
3.Inorder to review a decision, the petitioner should be able to point out an error which is apparent on the face of the record. In the present case, till date the order dated 24.09.2019 made in W.P.No.15377 of 2019 is in subsistence and it has not been modified by any other Appellate Authority or by any other Forum. When the order is in force, the petitioner has to implement the order. When there is no error which is apparent on the face of the record, filing review is mis-conceived.
4.The review application is accordingly dismissed. No costs.
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar(CS-IX)
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
pri
To
Villupuram District.
Review Application (Writ) No.176 of 2021 Against W.P.No.15377 of 2019
SJ(CO) CB(02/02/2022)
2 issues framed by the court
Whether a review can be maintained in the absence of an error apparent on the face of the record.
Whether the order of 24.09.2019 made in W.P.No.15377 of 2019 should be reviewed.
3 provisions across 2 enactments
Deputy Registrar / Managing Director, Tirukoilur Cooperative Urban Bank Ltd.
K.Palani
M. Dhandapani
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
