Allowed

Ganabathy v. the Inspector of Police

Madras HC8 Jan 2021CRL MP/8128/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This bail application sought extension of time to surrender and furnish sureties. The Court granted a two-week period starting from the date the order copy was made available on the e-courts portal, warning that anticipatory bail would be dismissed otherwise.

What did the court decide?

Two weeks granted to surrender and execute sureties from the date the order copy was made ready on the e-courts portal.

Ganabathy Vs the Inspector of Police — Anticipatory Bail | Madras HC (2021)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

Dated : 08.01.2021

¶3

CORAM :

¶4

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.BHARATHIDASAN

¶5

Crl.M.P.No.8128 of 2020

¶6

in Crl.O.P.No.10158 of 2020 Ganabathy ... Petitioner/Accused (A5) Vs. State by ... Respondent/Complainant The Inspector of Police, V-1, Villivakkam Police Station, Villivakkam, Chennai. (Crime No.693 of 2020) PRAYER : Criminal Miscellaneous Petition is filed under Section 482 of Criminal Procedure Code praying to extend of time for surrender and furnish surety comply with the condition in Crl.OP.No.10158 of 2020 order date on 07.07.2020 in Crime No.693 of 2020 on the file of the Inspector of Police, Villivakkam Police Station, Villivakkam, Chennai.

¶7

For Petitioner : Mr.S.Senthil Kumar
For Respondent : Mr.S.Karthikeyan
Additional Public Prosecutor
ORDER

¶8

(The case has been heard through video conference)

¶9

This petition has been filed to extend the time granted to the petitioner in Crl.O.P.No.10158 of 2020 dated 07.07.2020 to execute sureties and to comply with the conditions.

¶10

Heard both sides.

¶11

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this petition is ordered and two weeks time is granted to the petitioner to surrender and execute the sureties as ordered by this Court, from https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ the date on which the order copy made ready. Failing which, the

¶12

petition for anticipatory bail shall stand automatically dismissed.

¶13

-sd/08/01/2021

¶14

This order, on being produced, be punctually observed and carried into execution by all concerned

¶15

TRUE COPY
Sub-Assistant Registrar (Statistics/C.S.)
High Court, Madras - 600 104.
TO
1 THE METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE,
NO.XIII, EGMORE, CHENNAI.
2 THE CHIEF METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE,
EGMORE, CHENNAI. [FOR INFORMATION]
3 THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
HIGH COURT, MADRAS.
4 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE
V-1, VILLIVAKKAM POLICE STATION,
VILLIWAKKAM,
CHENNAI.
C.C. to M/S.S.SENTHIL KUMAR Advocate on payment of necessary
charges
Order
in
CRL MP.8128/2020
in
CRL OP.10158/2020
Date :08/01/2021
From 7.2.2001 the Registry is issuing certified
copies of the BAIL/Anti.BAIL Orders in this format

¶16

TA-02/02/2021

¶17

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Ganabathy v. the Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ganabathy v. the Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Dinesh Vs State Rep by

Chitra Vs State Rep by

K.Karan Vs State Rep. by

Noor Mohammed Vs State Rep. by

S.Sadhasivam Vs State by

Palanisamy Vs the State Rep.by