Thangavel v. State Rep by
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court of Madras granted anticipatory bail to petitioners accused of illegal sand mining. As a condition, they must deposit Rs.20,000 non-refundably, execute bonds with sureties, and report to police daily.
What did the court decide?
Petitioners ordered to be released on bail conditionally, including a non-refundable deposit of Rs.20,000 to the District Mineral Foundation Trust.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
( Criminal Jurisdiction )
Monday, the Sixth day of September Two Thousand Twenty One
PRESENT
The Hon`ble Mr Justice M.DHANDAPANI
CRIMINAL ORIGINAL PETITION No.15990 of 2021
1 THANGAVEL [ PETITIONERS / ACCUSED ]
2 RATHINASAMY
Vs
STATE REP BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, UTHIYUR POLICE STATION, TIRUPPUR DISTRICT. (CRIME NO.776/2020)
[ RESPONDENT ]
For Petitioner : M/S.P.KALIMUTHU Advocate
For Respondent : MR.A.GOPINATH, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side)
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether anticipatory bail should be granted to the petitioners apprehending arrest under Sections 379 IPC in relation to illegal transportation of stones.
Whether the petitioners are required to deposit a sum towards the District Mineral Foundation Trust as a condition for granting bail.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
THANGAVEL
- petitioner
RATHINASAMY
- respondent
STATE REP BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court