Disposed

N.Hariprasad Kumar v. State Rep. by

Madras HC3 Sept 2021CRL OP/15923/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Court disposed of an anticipatory bail petition by directing the respondent Police to complete the pending enquiry within two weeks. If a prima facie case exists, the FIR must be registered; otherwise, the petition involving the accused petitioner shall be closed.

What did the court decide?

Direction to complete inquiry within two weeks; register FIR if prima facie case exists, else close the petition.

N.Hariprasad Kumar Vs State Rep. by — Anticipatory Bail | Madras HC (2021)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

( Criminal Jurisdiction )

¶3

Friday, the Third day of September Two Thousand Twenty One

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

The Hon`ble Mr Justice M.DHANDAPANI

¶6

CRIMINAL ORIGINAL PETITION No.15923 of 2021

¶7

N.HARIPRASAD KUMAR [ PETITIONER / ACCUSED ]

¶8

¶9

STATE REP. BY [ RESPONDENT ] THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, POONAMALLE POLICE STATION, CHENNAI DISTRICT. (CRIME NO. NOT KNOWN OF 2021)

¶10

For Petitioner : M/S. S.RAJINI Advocate

¶11

For Respondent : MR. C.E.PRATAP, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side)

¶12

PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C.

¶13

ORDER : The Court Made the following order :-

¶14

The petitioner, who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent Police for the offence punishable under Sections 420 of IPC in Crime No.(Not known), seek anticipatory bail.

¶15

Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the respondent.

¶16

When the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the respondent Police submitted that petition enquiry is pending against the petitioners in C.S.R.No.1010 of 2021.

¶17

In view of the above submission made by the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side), the respondent Police is directed to complete the enquiry, within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order and in the enquiry, if a prima facie case is made out against the petitioners, the respondent police shall register the First Information Report, else the petition be closed.

¶18

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶19

This Criminal Original Petition is disposed of accordingly.

¶20

-sd/-

¶21

03/09/2021

¶22

This order, on being produced, be punctually observed and carried into execution by all concerned

¶23

TRUE COPY

¶24

Sub-Assistant Registrar (Statistics/C.S.) High Court, Madras - 600 104.

¶25

¶26

1 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, POONAMALLE POLICE STATION, CHENNAI DISTRICT.

¶27

2 THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT, MADRAS.

¶28

CC to M/S. S.RAJINI Advocate on payment of necessary charges

CRL OP.15923/2021

Date :03/09/2021

INBA 24/09/2021

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

N.Hariprasad Kumar v. State Rep. by

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

N.Hariprasad Kumar v. State Rep. by

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Jayasarah Jayachandran @ Sarah Devy Marie Madeline Vs the State Rep.by

K.Sathish Vs the State Rep by

Parvathi Vs State Rep by

Suman @ Suman Menon Vs G.Jayashree

Vinodh Kumar Vs the Inspector of Police

P.Arivoli Vs The Director General of Police