Disposed

John Bosco v. Ezhilrani

Madras HC6 Sept 2021CRL OP/27835/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This court disposed of a Section 482 Cr.P.C. petition challenging an order confirming interim maintenance. The court directed the petitioner to deposit the awarded amount (less deposits made) within two weeks and ordered the Principal Sessions Judge to complete the trial within three months.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner directed to deposit interim maintenance amount within two weeks; trial court directed to complete trial within three months.

John Bosco Vs Ezhilrani — Maintenance and Alimony | Madras HC (2021)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED : 06.09.2021

¶3

CORAM

¶4

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI

¶5

Crl.O.P.No.27835 of 2018

¶6

and

¶7

Crl. M.P. Nos. 16142 & 16144 of 2018

John Bosco

...Petitioner

Vs.

Ezhilrani

¶12

Minor Arthi Anandhi Rep. by next friend/Guardian Ist Respondent (Given up in the Lower Court) ...Respondents

¶13

Prayer: Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., to allow this petition and set-aside the order dated 07.07.2018 passed in Criminal Revision Petition No. 11 of 2016 in the Court of the Principal Sessions Judge, Cuddalore District, Cuddalore confirming the order dated 23.02.2016 passed in C.M.P. No. 4469 of 2014 in M.C. 29 of 2013 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate No.II, Panruti.

¶14

For Petitioner : Mr.D.Baskar For Respondents : Mr. A.S.Alaguraja

¶15

O R D E R

¶16

The present petition has been filed against the order dated 07.07.2018 passed in C.R.P. No. 11 of 2016 by the Court of the Principal Sessions Judge, Cuddalore District, Cuddalore confirming the order dated 23.02.2016 passed in C.M.P. No. 4469 of 2014 in M.C. 29 of 2013 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate No.II, Panruti.

¶17

The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the present original petition arises out of challenging the interim maintenance awarded by the trial Court in CMP. No.4469 of 2014 dated 23.02.2016 in MC.No.29 of 2013 on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate-II, Panruti and further, to permit the petitioner to raise all the issues in the main case during trial and issue direction to the trial Court to complete the trial within the reasonable time as fixed by this Court.

¶18

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶19

Considering the limited relief sought for by the

¶20

petitioner, without going into the merits of the case, this Court directs the petitioner to deposit the entire maintenance amount awarded by the trial Court in MC.No.29 of 2013, less the amount, if any already deposited, within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. Further, the learned Principal Sessions Judge, Cuddalore shall complete the trial within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

¶21

With the above directions, this Criminal Original Petition is disposed of. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

¶22

Assistant Registrar

¶23

//True Copy//

¶24

Sub Assistant Registrar

¶25

rli

¶26

¶27

The Principal Sessions Judge, Cuddalore.

¶28

2.The Judicial Magistrate-II, Panruti.

¶29

The Chief Judicial Magistrate, Cuddalore.

¶30

+1 CC to M/s.D.Baskar, Advocate, Sr.No. 45070.

¶31

+1 CC to M/s.A.S.Alaguraja, Advocate, Sr.No. 45005.

¶32

Crl.O.P.No.27835 of 2018

¶33

KSM(CO) LS(30/09/2021)

¶34

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

John Bosco v. Ezhilrani

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

John Bosco v. Ezhilrani

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

N.Hariprasad Kumar Vs State Rep. by

V.Kumar Vs the Sub-Inspector of Police

Kamaraj Vs State Rep.by

Maruthupandi Vs the State Rep. by

K.N.Babu Vs The Director General of Police

Sathiyaraj Vs State Rep by