Solomon v. v.Devaraj
Case brief
What is this about?
Intervenor petitioner sought permission to intervene in a pending criminal miscellaneous petition. Upon hearing counsel, the intervenor withdrew the petition, which was subsequently dismissed accordingly.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
( Criminal Jurisdiction )
Friday, the Nineteenth day of February Two Thousand Twenty One
PRESENT
The Hon`ble Mr Justice V. BHARATHIDASAN
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS PETITION No.605 of 2021
IN CRL.OP.NO.17022 OF 2020
SOLOMON [ INTERVENE PETITIONER ]
THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, R9, VALASARAVAKKAM POLICE STATION, CHENNAI. CRIME NO.46/2020.
Petition praying that in the circumstances stated therein the High Court will be pleased to permit the petitioner to intervene in Crl.O.P.No.17022 of 2020
Order : This petition coming on for orders upon perusing the petition and upon hearing the arguments of M/S.V.RAJIV RUFUS, Advocate for the petitioner and of MR. S.KARTHIKEYAN, ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR on behalf of the Respondent the court made the following order:-
Parties & counsel
- intervenor
SOLOMON
- respondent
THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, R9, VALASARAVAKKAM POLICE STATION, CHENNAI
Coram
V. BHARATHIDASAN
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court