Desappan v. State Rep. by
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner applied to relax the condition of daily reporting to police. Court held that since the petitioner was regularly complying with bail conditions, the mandatory daily reporting was modified to appearance only as required. Petition disposed.
What did the court decide?
Condition of reporting daily at 10.30 a.m. modified to appearance before police as and when required.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
( Criminal Jurisdiction )
Thursday, the Eighteenth day of February Two Thousand Twenty One
PRESENT
The Hon`ble Mr Justice V. BHARATHIDASAN
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS PETITION No.1690 of 2021
IN CRL OP.18199/2020
DESAPPAN [ PETITIONER / ACCUSED ]
Vs STATE REP. BY [ RESPONDENT ] INSPECTOR OF POLICE, POTHATTURPET POLICE STATION, THIRUVALLUR. CRIME NO.1238/2020
Petition praying that in the circumstances stated therein the High Court will be pleased to relax the conditional order the petitioner shall report before the respondent police every day at 10.30 a.m. until further orders dated 19.11.2020 imposed on the petitioner in Crl.O.P.No.18199 of 2020.
Order : This petition coming on for orders upon perusing the petition and upon hearing the arguments of M/S. R.VIVEKANANTHAN, Advocate for the petitioner and of MR. S.KARTHIKEYAN, ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR on behalf of the Respondent the court made the following order:-
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the condition of daily reporting to police imposed on the accused should be relaxed.
Whether the accused is regularly complying with the terms of the bail order.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
DESAPPAN
- respondent
STATE
Coram
V. BHARATHIDASAN
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court