Kumar v. State by
Case brief
What is this about?
Petition sought extension of time to surrender and furnish sureties under a prior bail order. Court granted two weeks from the order date to comply, warning of automatic dismissal of the anticipatory bail petition for failure.
What did the court decide?
Two weeks time granted to petitioner to comply with conditional order to surrender and furnish sureties.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
( Criminal Jurisdiction )
Thursday, the Eleventh day of March Two Thousand Twenty One
PRESENT
The Hon`ble Mr Justice V. BHARATHIDASAN
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS PETITION No.2932 of 2021
IN CRL OP.304/2021
KUMAR [ PETITIONER / ACCUSED ]
Vs
STATE BY [ RESPONDENT ]
INSPECTOR OF POLICE,
P-6 KODUNGAIYUR POLICE STATION,
CHENNAI.
CR.NO.14/2021.
Petition praying that in the circumstances stated therein the High Court will be pleased to extend further time to surrender the petitioner before the Metropolitan Magistrate, Egmore, Chennai and furnish the sureties as per the order of this Hon'ble Court made in Crl.OP.No.304 of 2021 on 18.01.2021.
Order : This petition coming on for orders upon perusing the petition and upon hearing the arguments of M/S.K.ARUN PRASAD, Advocate for the petitioner and of MR. S.KARTHIKEYAN, ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR on behalf of the Respondent the court made the following order:-
This Criminal Miscellaneous Petition has been filed to extend the time to the petitioner to comply with the conditional order dated 18.01.2021 made in Crl.O.P.No.304 of 2021.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
KUMAR
- respondent
STATE
Coram
V. BHARATHIDASAN
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court