Premanathan v. State Rep by
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner sought relaxation of bail conditions requiring monthly police appearances. Court upheld the existing order mandating compliance with prior directives.
What did the court decide?
Directed that the earlier bail order requiring periodic police appearance be complied with.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
( Criminal Jurisdiction )
Monday, the Twentieth day of December Two Thousand Twenty One
PRESENT
The Hon`ble Mrs Justice T.V. THAMILSELVI
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS PETITION No.13755 of 2021
IN CRL OP.16109 of 2020
PREMANATHAN [ PETITIONER / ACCUSED ]
Vs
STATE REP BY [ RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT ] THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, N2, KASIMEDU POLICE STATION, CHENNAI (CRIME NO.2271 OF 2020)
Petition praying that in the circumstances stated therein and in the affidavit filed therewith the High Court will be pleased to relax the condition imposed by this Honble Court in Crl.MP.8219/2021 in Crl.OP.16109/2020 dated 24.08.2021 i.e petitioner to appear before the respondent police on the first week of every Month 10.30 a.m., filling the charge sheet and thus render justice
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
PREMANATHAN
- respondent
STATE REP BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, N2, KASIMEDU POLICE STATION, CHENNAI
Coram
T.V. THAMILSELVI
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court