Ramu v. State Rep by
Case brief
What is this about?
The Criminal Miscellaneous Petition sought an extension of time to furnish sureties for the petitioner. The High Court, hearing both sides, granted a two-week extension from the date the order copy is made ready.
What did the court decide?
Extended two weeks time to the petitioner to surrender and execute sureties.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
( Criminal Jurisdiction )
Friday, the Seventeenth day of December Two Thousand Twenty One
PRESENT
The Hon`ble Mrs Justice T.V. THAMILSELVI
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS PETITION No.13638 of 2021
IN CRL OP.9841/2021
RAMU
[ PETITIONER/ACCUSED ]
Vs
STATE REP BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, D2 TIRUVALANGADU POLICE STATION, TIRUVLLUR DISTRICT (CRIME NO.87/2021)
[ RESPONDENT ]
Petition praying that in the circumstances stated therein and in the affidavit filed therewith the High Court will be pleased to extend the time for furnishing sureties in CRL.M.P.No.11768 of 2021 dated 19.11.2021 in Crl.OP.No.9841/2021 on 04.06.2021 in Crime No.87/2021 on the file of this Hon`ble Court.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to extend the time limit for the petitioner to furnish sureties and surrender.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
RAMU
- respondent
STATE REP BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, D2 TIRUVALANGADU POLICE STATION, TIRUVLLUR DISTRICT
Coram
T.V. THAMILSELVI
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court