Allowed

Govindhan v. State Rep by

Madras HC2 Nov 2021CRL MP/11295/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

A criminal miscellaneous petition seeking relaxation of a bail condition mandating daily police reporting. The court noted that the petitioners were complying with conditions and surrogated the daily reporting requirement with appearing only when notified.

What did the court decide?

Daily reporting condition before police relaxed; petitioners to appear only upon receipt of summons for interrogation.

Govindhan Vs State Rep by — Anticipatory Bail | Madras HC (2021)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

( Criminal Jurisdiction )

¶3

Tuesday, the Second day of November Two Thousand Twenty One

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

The Hon`ble Mr Justice M.DHANDAPANI

¶6

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS PETITION No.11295 of 2021

¶7

IN CRL.O.P.NO.15321 of 2021

¶8

1 GOVINDHAN [ PETITIONERS ] 2 GOVINDARAJ

¶9

¶10

STATE REP BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, FAIRLANDS POLICE STATION, SALEM DISTRICT. (CRIME NO.279/2021)

¶11

[ RESPONDENT ]

¶12

Petition praying that in the circumstances stated therein and in the affidavit filed therewith the High Court will be pleased to relax bail condition that the petitioner shall report before the respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m., until further order in Crl.O.P.No.15321 of 2021 dated 26/08/2021.

¶13

Order : This petition coming on for orders upon perusing the petition and the filed in support thereof and upon hearing the arguments of M/S.B.VASUDEVAN, Advocate for the petitioner, and of MR.A.GOPINATH, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) on behalf of the Respondent, the court made the following order:-

¶14

Vide Order dated 26.08.2021, this Court had enlarged the petitioners on anticipatory bail on certain conditions. This petition has been filed by the petitioners seeking relaxation of the conditions.

¶15

Learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the respondent, on instruction, submits that the petitioners have been complying with the conditions without fail.

¶16

In view of the above submission, this Court is of the considered view that the prayer as sought for by the petitioners could be acceded to.

¶17

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶18

Accordingly, the condition insofar as appearance as imposed by order dated 26.08.2021, alone stands relaxed and the petitioners shall appear before the respondent police as and when required for interrogation on receipt of summons. All other conditions remain unaltered.

¶19

-sd/-

¶20

02/11/2021

¶21

This order, on being produced, be punctually observed and carried into execution by all concerned

¶22

TRUE COPY

¶23

Sub-Assistant Registrar (Statistics/C.S.) High Court, Madras - 600 104.

¶24

¶25

1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, NO.V, SALEM.

¶26

2 THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE SALEM. [FOR INFORMATION]

¶27

3 THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT, MADRAS.

¶28

4 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, FAIRLANDS POLICE STATION, SALEM DISTRICT

¶29

5 THE CHAIRMAN/DISTRICT COLLECTOR, DISTRICT MINERAL FOUNDATION TRUST, SALEM.

¶30

+1 C.C. to M/S.B.VASUDEVAN Advocate on payment of necessary charges SR.NO.12428

¶31

in CRL MP.11295/2021 in CRL OP.15321/2021

¶32

Date :02/11/2021

¶33

From 7.2.2001 the Registry is issuing certified copies of the BAIL/Anti.BAIL Orders in this format

¶34

TA-18/11/2021

¶35

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Govindhan v. State Rep by

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Govindhan v. State Rep by

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ramesh Vs State Rep by

Faizal Rahman Vs State Rep by

Kalaivani Vs State by

Ramadass Vs the State Rep by

Dharma @ Dharman Vs State Rep by

Perumal Vs State Rep by