Perumal v. State Rep by
Case brief
What is this about?
This is a bail order extending the time granted to petitioners to execute a bond and provide sureties as a condition of bail, based on an affidavit.
What did the court decide?
Time extended by a further period of two weeks for petitioners to comply with the conditions of bail bond.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
( Criminal Jurisdiction )
Tuesday, the Second day of November Two Thousand Twenty One
PRESENT
The Hon`ble Mr Justice M.DHANDAPANI
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS PETITION No.11229 of 2021
IN CRL.O.P.No.18218 of 2020
1 PERUMAL 2 DHANABAKKIYAM 3 BABYSHALINI
[ PETITIONERS / A2 TO A4 ]
Vs [ RESPONDENT ]
STATE REP BY, THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, ALL WOMEN POLICE STATION, METTUR, SALEM DISTRICT CRIME NO.07 OF 2020.
Petition praying that in the circumstances stated therein and in the affidavit filed therewith the High Court will be pleased to extend the time of two weeks from the date of extension of time to execute the bond and sureties as imposed by this Honourable Court in Crl.M.P.No.8272 of 2021 dated 25.08.2021 and thus render justice.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
PERUMAL ET AL
- respondent
STATE
Coram
M. DHANDAPANI
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court