Partly allowed

Kalaivani v. State by

Madras HC1 Nov 2021CRL MP/11197/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court allowed a criminal miscellaneous petition seeking relaxation of bail conditions. The Court modified the appearance condition, allowing the first petitioner to appear as required, while other petitioners must appear every Monday until the charge sheet is filed.

What did the court decide?

The condition of daily appearance for the first petitioner was modified; other petitioners must appear every Monday at 10:30 AM.

Kalaivani Vs State by — Bail and Remand | Madras HC (2021)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

( Criminal Jurisdiction )

¶3

Monday, the First day of November Two Thousand Twenty One

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

The Hon`ble Mr Justice M.DHANDAPANI

¶6

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS PETITION No.11197 of 2021

¶7

IN CRL OP.14835/2021

¶8

1 KALAIVANI [ PETITIONERS/ACCUSED ] 2 MADHUMANI 3 SAKTHIVEL 4 THIMMARAJ

¶9

¶10

STATE BY [ RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT ] THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, MATHUR POLICE STATION, KRISHNAGIRI DISTRICT. (CRIME NO.250/2021)

¶11

Petition praying that in the circumstances stated therein and in the affidavit filed therewith the High Court will be pleased to relax the condition imposed in Crl.O.P.No.14835 of 2021 dated 19.08.2021 on condition that the petitioner is directed to appear before the respondent police daily at 10.30 am until further orders in Crime No.250 of 2021 on the file of the respondent police station and thus renders justice.

¶12

Order : This petition coming on for orders upon perusing the petition and the filed in support thereof and upon hearing the arguments of M/S. M.JAYACHANDRAN, Advocate for the Petitioner and of MR.A.GOPINATH Govt. Advocate (Crl. Side)on behalf of the Respondent the court made the following order:-

¶13

Vide order dated 19.08.2021, this Court had enlarged the petitioner on bail on certain conditions. This petition has been filed by the petitioner seeking relaxation of the condition with regard to the appearance.

¶14

Learned Government Advocate appearing for the respondents, on instruction, submits that the petitioner has been complying with the conditions without fail.

¶15

In view of the above submission, this Court is of the considered view that the prayer as sought for by the petitioner could be acceded to.

¶16

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶17

Accordingly, the condition insofar as appearance as imposed by order dated 19.08.2021 alone stands modified and the 1^st petitioner shall appear before the respondent police as and when required whereas the other petitioners shall appear before the respondent police on every Monday at 10.30 a.m till filing charge sheet and thereafter as and when required. All other conditions remain unaltered.

¶18

-sd/-

¶19

01/11/2021

¶20

This order, on being produced, be punctually observed and carried into execution by all concerned

¶21

TRUE COPY

¶22

Sub-Assistant Registrar (Statistics/C.S.) High Court, Madras - 600 104.

¶23

¶24

1 THE MUNSIF CUM JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, POCHAMPALLI.

¶25

2 THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE KRISHNAGIRI [FOR INFORMATION]

¶26

3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, MATHUR POLICE STATION, KRISHNAGIRI DISTRICT.

¶27

4 THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT, MADRAS.

¶28

C.C. to M/S. M.JAYACHANDRAN Advocate on payment of necessary charges

¶29

From 7.2.2001 the Registry is issuing certified copies of the BAIL/Anti.BAIL Orders in this format

¶30

CSK 16/11/2021

¶31

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Kalaivani v. State by

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Kalaivani v. State by

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

P.Manikandan Vs State Rep by

Gowtham Vs State Rep by

Ambika Vs State by

Shanmugasundari Vs State Rep. by

M.Kiran Kumar Vs the Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax

V.Radhakrishnan, Aged 61 Yrs Vs R.Naveen