A.Amarvarthi v. R.Venkatesan, IAS
Case brief
What is this about?
This contempt petition, filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, was closed. The Court noted that an appeal filed against the impugned order had been allowed in the earlier appeal proceedings.
What did the court decide?
The Court closed the contempt petition noting the appeal against the impugned order has been allowed.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Cont. Petn. No.898 of 2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Dated 16.07.2021
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE D.KRISHNAKUMAR
Cont. Petn. No.898 of 2013
A.Amaravathi, Director, Himabindu Infra Private Ltd., 10/2, Sanjeeveni Street, Arumbakkam-106. ... Petitioner
Vs.
R.Venkatesan, IAS, Member Secretary, CMDA. 1, Gandhi Irwin Road, Egmore, Chennai-8. ... Respondent
PRAYER : Contempt petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act to punish the respondent for willfull disobedience of the order dated 29.10.2012 passed in W.P.No.7386 of 2012.
For petitioner : Mr.A.E.Ravichandran For respondent : Mr.P.S.Ganesh (CMDA)
ORDER
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
A. Amaravathi, Director, Himabindu Infra Private Ltd.
- respondent
R. Venkatesan, IAS, Member Secretary, CMDA.
Coram
D. Krishnakumar
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court