The Court closed a contempt petition asserting that the fourth respondent had passed away and nothing survived for adjudication.
Petitioner's submission accepted that fourth respondent had passed away; contention dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Cont. Petn. No.1271 of 2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Dated 16.07.2021
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE D.KRISHNAKUMAR
Cont. Petn. No.1271 of 2014
T.William Moses, No.382, TVK Nagar, Sembium, Chennai 600 011 ... Petitioner
Vs.
PRAYER : Contempt petition filed under Section 10 and 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act to punish the respondents 1 to 4 having willfully and deliberately violated the orders of injunction passed in M.P.No.1 of 2013 in W.P.No.23942 of 2013 dated 11.11.2013.
Page 1 of 3
Cont. Petn. No.1271 of 2014
For petitioner : Mr.T.S.Rajamohan For respondents : Mr.M.Ganesan, Corporation for R1 to R3 Mr.S.Thiruvengadam for R4
ORDER
The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the
fourth respondent has passed away and hence, nothing survives for further adjudication in this contempt petition.
for the petitioner, this contempt petition is closed.
SD/-
ASSISTANT REGISTRAR(COMM.CASES) mst //Certified to be true copy//
Dated at Madras this the day of 2021.
COURT OFFICER(O.S.) from 25th day of September 2008 the Registry is issuing Certified copies of
the Orders/Judgments/Decrees in this format.
Gs/27/07/2021
To
Page 2 of 3
Cont. Petn. No.1271 of 2014
Office of the Executive Engineer, Zone IV, Ayanavaram, Chennai 600 023.
Page 3 of 3
T.William Moses
Mr.Vikram Kapoor
Mr. Mohanachandran
Mr. Senthil Nathan
Mr.K.Chandrasekar
D.Kristnakumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
