Petitioner filed a writ petition seeking direction to the respondent Board to consider her petition for compensation regarding her husband's death due to electrocution; Court directed consideration within 12 weeks.
Directed 2nd Respondent to consider petitioner's representation for compensation within 12 weeks and produce supporting documents within 2 weeks.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 15.07.2021
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE D.KRISHNAKUMAR
W.P.NO.5364 OF 2017
S.Aarathaal ..Petitioner
Vs
Prayer:
Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India for writ of mandamus, directing the respondents to consider the petitioner representation dated 10.02.2017.
For Petitioner : Mr.M.Murugesan
For Respondent No.1 to 3 : Mr.Abdul Kalam, TNEB
O R D E R
The prayer sought for in the present writ petition is to direct the respondents to consider the petitioner representation dated 10.02.2017.
Sd/Assistant Registrar(CS III)
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar ak
To
W.P.No.5364 of 2017
PCH(CO) CS/16/08/2021
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to direct the State Electricity Board to consider the petitioner's representation for compensation immediately?
2 provisions across 2 enactments
S.Aarathaal
The Chairman, Tamil Nadu Electricity Board
The Superintendent Engineer, Operation & Maintenance
The Executive Engineer, Rural/Palladam
D.Krishnakumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
