Dismissed

N.Natarajan v. Harmander Singh

Madras HC15 Jul 2021CONT P/599/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In this contempt petition under Sections 11 and 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, the petitioner sought punishment of respondents for disobeying an order dated 25.01.2021. The court observed that the petitioner accepted compliance via G.O.(D) No.216 dated July 13, 2021 and dropped the petition.

What did the court decide?

The Contempt Petition is dropped. There will be no order as to costs.

N.Natarajan Vs Harmander Singh — Contempt of Court | Madras HC (2021)

¶1

Contempt Petition No.599 of 2021

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 15.07.2021

¶3

CORAM :

¶4

THE HON'BLE MR.SANJIB BANERJEE, CHIEF JUSTICE

¶5

AND

¶6

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY

¶7

Contempt Petition No.599 of 2021

¶8

N.Natarajan, Chief Engineer, Commissionerate of Municipal Administration, MRC Nagar, Santhome High Road, Chennai - 600 028.

¶9

.. Petitioner

¶10

¶11

Harmander Singh, State of Tamil Nadu, Additional Chief Secretary to Government, Municipal Administration and WaterSupply Department, Secretariat, Chennai - 600 009.

¶12

K.Baskaran, Commissioner of Municipal Administration, 11th Floor, Urban Administrative Building, (Opp. to Ciba Building) No.75, Santhome High Road, MRC Nagar, Raja Annamalaipuram, Chennai-600 028.

¶13

G.Prakash, Commissioner of Greater Chennai Corporation, Chennai - 600 003.

¶14

.. Respondents

¶15

Prayer: Petition under Sections 11 and 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 to punish the respondents for contempt of the order dated 25.01.2021 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ passed by this Court in W.A.No.48 of 2021.

¶16

Page 1 of 3

¶17

Contempt Petition No.599 of 2021

¶18

For Petitioner	: Mr.P.Wilson
	Senior Counsel
	for M/s.P.Wilson Associates
For Respondents	: Mr.P.Muthukumar
	Counsel for the State
	for respondent Nos.1 and 2
	Ms.Karthika Ashok
	SSC (Corporation)
	for respondent No.3

¶19

ORDER

¶20

(Order of the Court was made by the Hon'ble Chief Justice ) Since the petitioner now accepts that the relevant order has been

¶21

complied with, as G.O.(D) No.216 dated July 13, 2021 also indicates,

¶22

Contempt Petition No.599 of 2021 is dropped.

¶23

There will be no order as to costs. Consequently, Sub Application

¶24

(OS) No.143 of 2021 is closed.

¶25

SD/-

¶26

sasi

¶27

ASSISTANT REGISTRAR(COMM.CASES) //Certified to be true copy//

¶28

Dated at Madras this the day of 2021.

¶29

COURT OFFICER(O.S.) from 25^th day of September 2008 the Registry is issuing Certified copies of the Orders/Judgments/Decrees in this format.

¶30

GS/27/07/2021

¶31

¶32

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶33

Page 2 of 3

¶34

Contempt Petition No.599 of 2021

¶35

The Additional Chief Secretary to Government, State of Tamil Nadu, Municipal Administration and WaterSupply Department, Secretariat, Chennai - 600 009.

¶36

The Commissioner of Municipal Administration, 11th Floor, Urban Administrative Building, (Opp. to Ciba Building) No.75, Santhome High Road, MRC Nagar, Raja Annamalaipuram, Chennai-600 028.

¶37

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶38

Page 3 of 3

N.Natarajan v. Harmander Singh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

N.Natarajan v. Harmander Singh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

P.Rajendrababu, Aged 45 Vs The State of Tamilnadu

B.Ramamoorthy Vs Chief Election Commission of India

R.Subramanyam Vs The District Collector

B.Guhanathan Vs The Principal Secretary to Government

Chennai Pooganagar Perunthalaivar Vs The Commissioner

M.Balaji Vs The Principal Home Secretary