Petitioner opposed police station construction on grazing lands. Court permitted fresh representation to collector for consideration with reasoned order, disposing of the petition without deciding merits.
Petitioner permitted to submit fresh representation; respondent directed to consider and pass reasoned order within eight weeks.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 14.07.2021
CORAM :
THE HON'BLE MR.SANJIB BANERJEE, CHIEF JUSTICE
AND
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY
W.P.No.14466 of 2021
R.Subramanyam
... Petitioner
Vs
Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issue of Writ of Mandamus forbearing the respondents or their subordinates from putting up construction in S.F.No.223/1 situate at Rakkiapalayam Village, Avinashi Taluk, Tiruppur District, which is classified as "Mandhai" (grazing lands) for the purpose of setting up Thirumuruganpoondi Police Station.
For Petitioner : Mr.K.Govi Ganesan
For Respondents : Mr.P.Muthukumar Counsel for the State
ORDER
(Order of the Court was made by Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy, J.)
The petitioner seeks to prevent construction of a police station in S.F.No.223/1, Rakkiapalayam Village, Avinashi Taluk, Tiruppur District.
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar(CS VII)
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
bbr
To
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the court should interfere with the intent to construct a police station on lands classified as grazing land pending formal representation.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
R.Subramanyam
The District Collector, Tiruppur District
The Commissioner of Police, Tiruppur
The District Revenue Officer
The Tahsildar, Avinashi Taluk
Sanjib Banerjee
Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
