T.PushpaBai v. Thiru. J.Balaji
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court held that the previous order directing possession recovery was duly complied with. Based on this, the court closed the contempt petition without further adjudication.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 09.04.2021
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.BHARATHIDASAN
Cont. P. No. 449 of 2021 in W.P. No. 35806 of 2019
T.Pushpa Bai, W/o. Thankaraj, 50, TNSCB Complex, Tirumangalam Signal, Anna Nagar, Chennai-600 040
... Petitioner
Versus
Thiru J.Balaji, Revenue Divisional Officer, Mayiladuthurai-609 001. Now Mayiladuthurai Dt.
... Respondent
PRAYER : Contempt Petition is filed under Section 11 of Contempt of Court Act, 1971 praying to punish the respondent herein for committing contempt of court for having flouted and disobeyed the order passed by this Hon'ble Court in W.P.No.35806 of 2019 dated 01.09.2020.
For Petitioner : Mr.R.Ravi For Respondent : Mr.E.Balamurugan, Special Govt. Pleader
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
T.Pushpa Bai
- respondent
J.Balaji
Coram
V. Bharathidasan
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court