Petitioners withdrew a writ petition challenging interference with possession of property including coconut trees. The High Court dismissed the petition as withdrawn and closed the connected miscellaneous petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 08.04.2021 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.BHARATHIDASAN W.P.No. 8956 of 2021 and W.M.P. No.9473 of 2021
For Petitioner : Mr.K.Suresh For Respondents : Mr.E.Balamurugan, Special Govt. Pleader for R1 to R5
ORDER
(The case has been heard through video conference)
Today, when the matter was taken up for hearing, after advancing the arguments, Mr.K.Suresh, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners want to withdraw this Writ Petition.
+1 cc to Mr.K.Suresh, Advocate, SR.NO.22430
W.P.No. 8956 of 2021
PCH(CO) NS(04/05/2021)
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Muthusamy and others
The District Collector, Namakkal District
V. Bharathidasan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
