In a civil miscellaneous petition, the court converted an interim injunction order into an absolute one. The respondent counsel had no objection to making the stay absolute. The case is adjourned post-first appeal for final hearing.
The order of injunction granted previously is made absolute.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
( Civil Appellate Jurisdiction )
Monday, the First day of November Two Thousand Twenty One
PRESENT
THE HON`BLE MS.JUSTICE P.T.ASHA
C.M.P.No.22034 of 2018
IN A.S.No.838 of 2018
PERUMAL G.JAYASHANKAR [ PETITIONER ] S/O GANGADHARAN, C/O DR.N.KUMARASAMY, NO.24, THANIKACHALAM ROAD, T.NAGAR, CHENNAI-17.
Vs
1 RAGHUPATHY [ RESPONDENTS ]
2 GNANASOUNDARI
3 SHANKARANARAYANAN
4 SANTHI
R2 TO R4 REPRESENTED BY POWER AGENT R.MURTHI, S/O RAMASAMY, NO.69, 13TH CROSS STREET, INDIRA NAGAR, ADYAR, CHENNAI 600 020.
Petition praying that in the circumstances stated therein and in the affidavit filed therewith the High Court will be pleased to grant an order of injunction restraining the respondents, their men, agents and servants, any one claiming under them are acting on their behalf from in any way dealing with the property forming subject matter of the suit O.S.No.11977/2010 on the file of XVIII Additional City civil Court, Chennai either by alienating or encumbering the same (IN C.M.P.No.22034/2018) pending disposal of the above A.S.NO.838 of 2018.
XEROX COPY OF SCHEDULE OF PROPERTY IS ATTACHED
Order : This petition coming on this day for hearing upon perusing the petition and the affidavit filed in support thereof and upon hearing the arguments of M/S.T.BALAJI, Advocate for the petitioner and of MR.M.MUTHAPPAN, Advocate for the Respondents, the court made the following order:-
Mr.M.Muthappan, learned counsel appearing for the respondent has no objection if the injunction being made absolute.
-sd/01/11/2021 / TRUE COPY /
Sub-Assistant Registrar ( Statistics / C.S. ) High Court, Madras - 600 104. TO
THE XVIII ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL JUDGE, CHENNAI.
IN A.S.No.838 of 2018
Date :01/11/2021
From 26.2.2001 the Registry is issuing certified copies of the Interim Orders in this format TP(11/11/2021)
1 issue framed by the court
Whether an interlocutory order granting an injunction should be made absolute.
Perumal G.Jayashankar
Raghaupt
P.T.Asha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
