A.Palanivel v. M.Devi
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court of Madras dismissed an appeal filed under Section 96 of the CPC as it was withdrawn by the appellant's counsel with instructions from the client. Connected miscellaneous petitions were closed.
What did the court decide?
Appeal dismissed as withdrawn. Connected miscellaneous petitions closed. Court fees to be refunded.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
01.11.2021
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE Ms. JUSTICE P.T. ASHA
A.S.No.357 of 2020 & CMP Nos.4189 & 4190 of 2020
A.Palanivel ... Appellant/ 1st Defendant
Vs.
1.M.Devi 2.The District Collector, Salem, Salem District. ... Respondents / Plaintiff / 2nd defendant
PRAYER: This Appeal Suit is filed under Section 96 of C.P.C. R/W. Order 41 Rule (1) of C.P.C. against the Judgment and Decree dated 20.12.2019 made in O.S.No.124 of 2018 (POP No.122/2017) on the file of the learned First Additional District Court, Salem.
For Appellant : Mr.N.Manokaran For Respondents: No appearance
JUDGMENT
The learned counsel for the appellant has submitted a letter dated 26.10.2021 to the Registrar (Judicial) stating that he has received instructions from his client asking him to withdraw the appeal and a letter received from his client is also enclosed along with the above letter.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
A. Palanivel
- respondent
M. Devi
- respondent
District Collector, Salem
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court