The Special Bench held that in light of the reasons provided in the affidavit, the 210-day delay in filing the petition was condoned, and the application to condone delay was allowed.
Delay of 210 days in representing the Special Temporary Application was condoned.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
C.M.P. No. 19240 of 2021 in
S.T.A. No. SR103700 of 2019
R.MAHADEVAN, J. and MOHAMMED SHAFFIQ, J.
This petition is filed by the appellant seeking to condone the delay of 210 days in representing the above S.T.A. No. SR103700 of 2019.
2.Heard both sides.
[R.M.D., J.] [M.S.Q., J.] 26.11.2021
Maya
Note : Registry is directed to print the name of M/s. Lakshmi Kumaran, Sridharan, Raghavan Ramabadran as counsel for the respondent in the cause-list.
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the delay of 210 days in filing the Special Temporary Application should be condoned?
Whether the reasons stated in the affidavit satisfy the requirement for condonation of delay?
Appellant
R.Mahadevan
Mohammed Shaffiq
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
