Partly allowed

Chellaperumal, v. Pandian

Madras HC7 Oct 2021CMP/14484/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Madras allowed the petitioner's petition to recall a Second Appeal (SA.31/2011) previously dismissed for non-prosecution, restored the case for final hearing, and listed it for final hearing after three weeks based on satisfied reasons in the affidavit.

What did the court decide?

The petition was allowed; the Second Appeal was restored and listed for final hearing after three weeks.

Chellaperumal, Vs Pandian — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Madras HC (2021)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

( Civil Appellate Jurisdiction )

¶3

Thursday, the Seventh day of October Two Thousand Twenty One

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

THE HON`BLE MRS.JUSTICE R.HEMALATHA

¶6

CMP.No.14484 of 2021

¶7

in SA.No.31 of 2011

¶8

1 CHELLAPERUMAL [ PETITIONERS ]

2 ALAMELU

3 KALAVATHI

1 PANDIAN [ RESPONDENTS ]

¶13

2 THANDAVARAYAN

¶14

3 DHAVENDRAN

¶15

4 ARUMUGAM

¶16

5 MANI

¶17

6 KALIYAPERUMAL

¶18

7 PADMAVATHY

¶19

8 PALANIVEL

¶20

9 RAJADURAI

¶21

10 THANGARATHNAM

¶22

11 VEERAMUTHU 12 SELVAKUMAR

¶23

Petition praying that in the circumstances stated therein and in the affidavit filed therewith the High Court will be pleased to recall the order made in Sa.No.31/2011 dated 10/08/2021 in dismissing the above case for non-prosecution thereby restoring the said case on file and to decide the same (in CMP.No.14484/2021)

¶24

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶25

Order: This Second Appeal coming on this day for hearing upon perusing the Grounds of Appeal, the Judgment and Decrees of the Lower Appellate Court and the Court of First instance and the material papers in the suit and upon hearing the arguments of M/S.G.GOKUL, Advocate for the Petitioner and of M/S.GAYATHIRI, for M/S.SARVABHAUMAN ASSOCIATES, Advocate for the Respondents, the court made the following order:-

¶26

This petition is filed to restore the Second Appeal No.31/2011, which was dismissed for non prosecution on 10.08.2021.

¶27

The learned counsel for the respondents did not raise any objection.

¶28

This Court is also satisfied with the reasons assigned in the affidavit filed in support of this petition. Hence, this petition is allowed.

¶29

List the Second Appeal for final hearing after three weeks.

-sd/-

07/10/2021

/ TRUE COPY /

Sub-Assistant Registrar ( Statistics / C.S. )

¶34

High Court, Madras - 600 104.

¶35

¶36

1 THE PRINCIPAL DISTRICT MUNSIF, VRIDDHACHALAM

¶37

2 THE PRINCIPAL SUBORDINATE JUDGE, VRIDDHACHALAM

Order

CMP.No.14484 of 2021

in SA.No.31 of 2011

Date :07/10/2021

From 26.2.2001 the Registry is issuing certified copies of the Interim Orders in this format DV(08/10/2021)

¶44

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Chellaperumal, v. Pandian

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Chellaperumal, v. Pandian

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Kanagammal Vs Dheenan

Dhadapani W/O.Vneugopal Padayc Vs K.Kannan S/O.Kaliperumal Vandr

Lakshmi Vs Shanmugham

Chakrapani Asari (Died) Vs C.Gopishankar

Sundharamoorthy Vs Thillakarasi

Nagappan(Died), Vs Kadirvel