Tmt S.Gandhimathi v. Tmt N.Pavunambal (Deceased) and 17 Others
Case brief
What is this about?
9687 of 2019 in C.S.No.1117 of 1992…
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
A.Nos.9685, 9686 and 9687 of 2019 in C.S.No.1117 of 1992
N.SESHASAYEE, J.,
The learned counsel for the plaintiff makes
a statement that due to Covid restrictions,
he could not arrive to the Registry to carry
out the amendment.
2. Time is granted to carry out necessary
amendment.
3. Post the case on 02.09.2021.
03.08.2021
ssn
Coram
N.SESHASAYEE
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
Tamilnad Mercantile Bank Ltd. Vs M/s.Cholamandalam Investment and Finance Company Ltd. and 4 others
Ponniamman Educational Trust Vs the Chruch of Christ Charitable Trust and Educational and Another
M/s Ip SoftcomIndia Pvt. Ltd, Represented by its Director a.Ravichandran, Vs M/s Wardwiz India Solutions Private Ltd.
Jayalakshmi Vs D.Balaraman