Allowed

M/s Ip SoftcomIndia Pvt. Ltd, Represented by its Director a.Ravichandran, v. M/s Wardwiz India Solutions Private Ltd.

Madras HC9 Mar 2021OP/569/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The petitioner filed an original petition under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act to appoint a sole arbitrator based on a contractual clause. Noting that the respondents appeared but filed no counter, the Court exercised its power under Section 11(13) to appoint Mrs. Chitra Sampath as the sole arbitrator to resolve the debt dispute.

What did the court decide?

Mrs. Chitra Sampath appointed as sole arbitrator; award to be passed within six months; proceedings under Madras High Court Arbitration Centre.

M/s Ip SoftcomIndia Pvt. Ltd, Represented by its Director… — Arbitration | Madras HC (2021)

¶1

O.P.No.569 of 2020

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

Dated : 09.03.2021

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HONOURABLE Ms. JUSTICE P.T. ASHA

¶6

O.P.No.569 of 2020 M/s.IP Softcom India Private Limited Represented by its Director A.Ravichandran No.18 & 19, Mahalakshmi Nagar Extn. Numbal Village, Thiruverkadu Post Chennai – 600 077 ... Petitioner Vs. 1.M/s.Wardwiz India Solutions Private Limited Unit No.101, First Floor, Pride Purple Accord, Baner Road, Pune – 411 045 2.M/s.Welkin IT Services Private Limited Office No.102, 1^st Floor, Pride Purple Accord, Baner Road, Pune – 411 045 ... Respondents Prayer : The Petition is filed under Section 11 A of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to appoint a sole arbitrator as per clause 8 of the Contract of Guarantee dated 01.02.2020 for the purpose of adjudication of

¶7

1/5

¶8

http://www.judis.nic.in

¶9

O.P.No.569 of 2020

¶10

the dispute that has arisen between the petitioner and the respondent in respect payment of legally enforceable debt from the respondents, under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

¶11

For Petitioner : Mr.V.Vinay Metha For Respondents : Mr.Sivalinga Kesavan ORDER The above petition is filed for appointing an arbitrator in terms of clause 8 of the Contract of Guarantee dated 01.02.2020 entered into between the petitioner and the respondents. The respondents were served and had entered appearance on 05.02.2021. However, the counter has not been filed to date. Therefore, taking note of Section 11 (13) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, this Court is proceeding to pass order in the absence of the counter but the counsel has made his submission.

¶12

Clause 8 of the Contract of Guarantee would read as follows:

¶13

“In the event that the Corporate Debtor commits breach of the

¶14

settlement Agreement the Operational Creditor has the right to proceed

¶15

2/5

¶16

http://www.judis.nic.in

¶17

O.P.No.569 of 2020

¶18

against, either the Corporate Debtor or the Corporate Guarantor, to claim the remaining outstanding debt, by initiating appropriate legal action under the law including remedies under Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016. In addition to the Insolvency action, the parties agree to resolve any dispute arising out of this agreement finally by arbitration under the Indian Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The dispute shall be referred to a sole arbitrator to be appointed by the Operational Creditor. The venue of arbitration shall be Chennai. The parties agree that the entire cost of the arbitration shall be borne

¶19

by the Corporate Debtor and the Corporate Guarantor.”

¶20

Admittedly, there is a dispute between the petitioner and the respondents. Notice have also been issued by the petitioner to the respondents herein to which despite receipt no response has been given by the respondents.

¶21

Therefore, taking note of the arbitration clause and the fact that

¶22

disputes have arisen between the parties, this Court is passing the following order:

¶23

i) Mrs.Chitra Sampath, Senior Advocate, No.14/1 Kamatchipuram I

¶24

3/5

¶25

http://www.judis.nic.in

¶26

O.P.No.569 of 2020

¶27

St, West Mambalam, Chennai – 600 033, Mob: 9962085956, is appointed

¶28

as an Arbitrator.

¶29

ii) The arbitrator may, after issuing notice to the parties and upon hearing them, pass an award as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of six months from the date of entering reference. It is open to the respondent to raise all legal objections as to the validity of contract.

¶30

iii) The arbitrator is at liberty to fix the remuneration and other incidental expenses as per law.

¶31

iv) The proceedings may be conducted under the aegis of the Madras High Court Arbitration Centre and in accordance with the Madras High Court Arbitration Rules.

¶32

The Original Petition is ordered leaving the parties to bear their own costs. No costs.

¶33

09.03.2021

¶34

Internet : Yes/No Index :Yes/No Speaking / Non-Speaking kan

¶35

4/5

¶36

http://www.judis.nic.in

O.P.No.569 of 2020

P.T. ASHA. J,

kan

O.P.No.569 of 2020
09.03.2021

¶41

5/5

¶42

http://www.judis.nic.in

M/s Ip SoftcomIndia Pvt. Ltd, Represented by its Director a.Ravichandran, v. M/s Wardwiz India Solutions Private Ltd.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M/s Ip SoftcomIndia Pvt. Ltd, Represented by its Director a.Ravichandran, v. M/s Wardwiz India Solutions Private Ltd.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M/s.Sikka Cars Private Limited Vs M/s.Ford India Private Limited

Vs

M/s Ashok Leyland Limited, Represented by its Divisional Manager, Vs M/s Gaurav Automobiles, Proprietor-Mr.Vinit Bansal

Tamilnad Mercantile Bank Ltd. Vs M/s.Cholamandalam Investment and Finance Company Ltd. and 4 others

Ponniamman Educational Trust Vs the Chruch of Christ Charitable Trust and Educational and Another

Tamil Nadu Generation and Distribution Corporation Ltd. Vs Navayuga Info Tech Private Limited and 2 others