A single-paragraph order dismissing an application as an abuse of process, citing previous similar dismissals, without detailed case facts.
No costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
A.No.1186 of 2020 in CS.No.1306 of 1992
P.T.ASHA, J.
It is unfortunate that despite two orders passed by Division
Benches of this Court, one dated 17.04.2017 in OSA.No.95 of 2017 and the other dated 18.06.2018 in OSA.No.29 of 2018, once again the 3rd defendant has filed this application for permitting the applicant to mark the documents as secondary evidence. This application is nothing but an abuse of process of Court. Therefore the application stands dismissed. No costs.
10.03.2021
mrn
1/2
P.T.ASHA, J.
mrn
A.No.1186 of 2020
in
CS.No.1306 of 1992
10.03.2021
2/2
ASHA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
