The court dismissed an application to punish the respondent for disobedience of an injunction order, ruling that the application has become infructuous after the Registrar of Companies approved the proposed name change of the defendant.
The application was closed as having become infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
(ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION)
MONDAY, THE 5TH DAY OF AUGUST 2021
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.SUBRAMANIAN
A. No.7702 of 2017
in
C.S. No.345 of 2011
C.S. No.345 of 2011:-
2. M/s.Savera Industries Limited,(*) No.146, Dr.Radhakrishnan Road, Mylapore, Chennai-600 004 State of Tamil Nadu, India.
... Plaintiffs
-Versus-
Masti Health and Beauty Pvt. Ltd., Plot No.230, Road No.78, Jubilee Hills, Hyderabad-500 033.
... Defendant
A. No.7702 of 2017:-
Shyam Investments, No.1, Cathedral Road, Mylapore, Chennai-600 086 rep. by its Partner, Ms.Nina Reddy ... Applicant/1st Plaintiff
-Versus-
2
Masti Health and Beauty Pvt. Ltd., Plot No.230, Road No.78, Jubilee Hills, Hyderabad-500 033. ... Respondent/Defendant
Application praying that this Hon'ble Court be pleased to order for appropriate action against the respondent for willful and deliberate disobedience of the injunction order daed 10.07.2012 passed by this Hon'ble Court in O.A.Nos.446 and 447 of 2011 in C.S.No.345 of 2011 which is subsisting till date.
This Application coming on this day before this court for hearing, the Court made the following order:
This application has been filed under Order XXXIX Rule 2A of C.P.C., seeking to punish the respondent for having committed contempt of the interim order of injunction granted in the suit.
2.Mr.Anand Sashidharan, learned counsel appearing for the defendant / respondent would submit that the formalities have been completed and the Registrar of Companies has also approved the name change as proposed by the defendant and therefore, nothing survives in this application.
3.Mr.Rahul M.Shankar, learned counsel appearing for the applicant would submit that the factum of change of the corporate name of the defendant has been approved by the Registrar of Companies and the proceedings have been furnished to him.
3
4.In view of the said statement made by the learned counsel appearing
for the parties, this application is closed as having become infructuous.
Sd./-RSMJ 05.08.2021
//Certified to be true copy// Dated at Madras this the day of 2021.
COURT OFFICER(O.S.) From 25th Day of September 2008 the Registry is issuing certified copies of the Orders/Judgments/Decrees in this format. Jj 18/08/2021
Shyam Investments (Mallan Nina Reddy)
Masti Health and Beauty Pvt. Ltd.
R.Subramaniam
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
