Dismissed

Sruthikeerthi v. The Commissioner of police

Madras HC19 Feb 2020WP(MD)/1904/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petition sought a writ of Mandamus directing police officials to issue a Look Out Circular against the third respondent in a pending criminal case. The court was informed that the relevant authority had already issued the circular via letter dated 18.02.2020, leading to the closure of the petition.

What did the court decide?

Writ petition closed; no direction granted for LOC issuance as matter declared settled.

Sruthikeerthi Vs The Commissioner of police — Criminal Trial and Appeal | Madras HC (2020)

¶1

W.P.(MD)No.1904 of 2020

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED :19.02.2020 CORAM

¶3

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA

¶4

W.P.(MD)No.1904 of 2020

¶5

Sruthikeerthi ... Petitioner

¶6

Vs.

¶7

1.The Commissioner of Police, Madurai City, Madurai.

¶8

2.The Inspector of Police (AWPS), Thallakulam Police Station, Madurai City, Madurai.

¶9

3.Manikandan ... Respondents

¶10

PRAYER:- Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a Writ of Mandamus, to direct the respondents 1 and 2 to take appropriate steps for the issuance of Look Out Circular (LOC) as against the third respondent in connection with the investigation pending in Crime No.47 of 2019, on the file of the second respondent police, by considering the petitioner's representation, dated 23.11.2019 within the period that may be stipulated by this Court.

¶11

For Petitioner : Mr.R.Gandhi For R1 and R2 : Mrs. S.Bharathi Government Advocate(Crl.Side)

¶12

ORDER

¶13

This writ petition has been filed seeking for a direction to the respondents 1 and 2 to take appropriate steps for the issuance of Look Out Circular (LOC) as against the third respondent in connection with the investigation pending in Crime No.47 of 2019, on the file of the second respondent police, by considering the petitioner's representation, dated 23.11.2019 within the period that may be stipulated by this Court.

¶14

2.Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the respondents 1 and 2.

¶15

3.Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned Government Advocate (Crl. side) for the respondents 1 and 2 would https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶16

1/2

¶17

W.P.(MD)No.1904 of 2020

¶18

submit that the first respondent has sent a letter dated 18.02.2020, in C.No.IS/A10/623/2020, to the Assistant Director/Immigration, Bureau of Immigration, Ministry of Home Affairs, Government of India, East Block-8, Level-4, Sector-1, R.K.Puram, Newl Delhi, to maintain the Look Out Circular pending against the third respondent in connection with Crime No.47 of 2019, registered by the second respondent police.

¶19

4.Recording the same, the writ petition stands closed. No costs.

¶20

// True Copy //

¶21

sji To

¶22

1.The Commissioner of Police, Madurai City, Madurai. 2.The Inspector of Police (AWPS), Thallakulam Police Station, Madurai City, Madurai.

¶23

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶24

2/2

Sruthikeerthi v. The Commissioner of police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sruthikeerthi v. The Commissioner of police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Muthuramalinga Pandi Vs The Inspector of Police

Ilayaraja Vs the Sub Inspector of Police

Ilayaraja Vs the Sub Inspector of Police

Ramamoorthy Vs The Inspector of Police

C.Durai Raj Vs The Superintendent of police

Thangapandy Vs The Inspector of Police