Disposed

Jelastin Babu v. the Assistant Director of Fisheries

Madras HC5 Nov 2020WP(MD)/13468/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In W.P.(MD)No.13468 of 2020, the Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court directed the second respondent to consider the petitioner's representation regarding permission to harvest fish from Puthukulam tank till May 2021, ensuring final orders are passed on merits within six weeks.

What did the court decide?

Directed second respondent to consider petitioner's representation and pass final orders on merits within six weeks.

Jelastin Babu Vs the Assistant Director of… — Contract and Commercial Disputes | Madras HC (2020)

¶1

W.P.(MD)No.13468 of 2020

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 05.11.2020 CORAM:

¶3

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE W.P.(MD)No.13468 of 2020

Jelastin Babu

... Petitioner

1.The Assistant Director of Fisheries,

¶8

Fisheries Department,

¶9

Vadasery, Nagarcoil,

¶10

Kanyakumari District.

¶11

2.The Assistant Executive Engineer, Public Works Department,

¶12

Thuckalay, Kannyakumari District.

¶13

3.The President,

¶14

Kannyakumari District Fishermen

¶15

Co-operative Federation Y23,

¶16

Nagarcoil, Kannyakumari District. ... Respondents

¶17

PRAYER: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Mandamus, to direct the respondents to consider the petitioner's representation dated 18.08.2020 and grant permission to harvest the fishes from Puthukulam tank till May 2021.

¶18

For Petitioner : Mr.A.Balakrishnan

¶19

For Respondents : Mr.C.Ramar Additional Government Pleader

¶20

ORDER

¶21

This writ petition has been filed for a Mandamus seeking for a direction to the respondents to consider the petitioner's representation dated 18.08.2020, seeking permission to harvest the fish from Puthukulam tank till May 2021.

¶22

2 . Mr.C.Ramar, learned Additional Government Pleader, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents.

¶23

3 . Heard Mr.A.Balakrishnan, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Mr.C.Ramar, learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the respondents.

¶24

4 . It is the case of the petitioner that he has been harvesting fish in the aforementioned tank from 09.09.2014 to https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶25

1/3

¶26

W.P.(MD)No.13468 of 2020

¶27

09.09.2019 under a lease agreement with the second respondent. According to him, even after the expiry of lease, the respondents have not conducted any fresh auction for leasing out the tank for the purpose of harvesting the fish. In such circumstances, he has given a representation dated 18.08.2020 to the respondents seeking permission to harvest the fish in the aforementioned tank till May 2021. According to him, till date, the said representation has not been duly considered by the respondents.

¶28

5. Mr.C.Ramar, learned Additional Government Pleader, appearing for the respondents would submit that the period of lease has already been expired as early as on 09.09.2019 and therefore, the representation of the petitioner seeking for permission to harvest the fish in the tank cannot be considered by the respondents.

¶29

6 . However, it is the contention of the petitioner that ever since the expiry of the lease on 09.09.2019, no further auction has been conducted by the respondents. In such circumstances, no prejudice will be caused to the respondents, if the representation of the petitioner dated 18.08.2020, seeking permission to harvest the fish at Puthukulam tank till May 2021, is considered by the respondents on merits and in accordance with law.

¶30

7 . For the foregoing reasons, this Court directs the second respondent to consider the petitioner's representation dated 18.08.2020 seeking for permission to harvest the fish at Puthukulam Tank till May 2021 and pass final orders on merits and in accordance with law, within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

¶31

8 . With the aforesaid direction, the Writ Petition stands disposed of. No costs.

¶32

// True Copy //

¶33

tsg

¶34

Note :In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the Advocate/litigant concerned.

¶35

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶36

2/3

¶37

W.P.(MD)No.13468 of 2020

¶38

¶39

1.The Assistant Director of Fisheries, Fisheries Department, Vadasery, Nagarcoil, Kanyakumari District. 2.The Assistant Executive Engineer, Public Works Department, Thuckalay, Kannyakumari District. 3.The President, Kannyakumari District Fishermen Co-operative Federation Y23, Nagarcoil, Kannyakumari District.

¶40

+1 CC to SPL GP ( SR-21495[F] dated 06/11/2020 )

¶41

W.P.(MD)No.13468 of 2020 05.11.2020

¶42

VB (18.11.2020) 3P 5C

¶43

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶44

3/3

Jelastin Babu v. the Assistant Director of Fisheries

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Jelastin Babu v. the Assistant Director of Fisheries

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

K. Sivagami, W/O. R.B. Anand, Vs the Secretary to Government

Tvl.J.F.International Vs the Commissioner of Commercial Taxes

P.Prabakar, Vs the Special Commissioner for

Puppy S Krishna Ice Factory, Vs the Superintending Engineer

Manikandan @ Bullet Mani, Vs the District Manager

A.Abdul Jabbar, Vs the Tamil Nadu Wakf Board