R.Raghavan, v. The Tasildhar
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court dismissed a writ petition for withdrawal after the petitioner sought liberty to approach the concerned authority following a bifurcation of district jurisdiction.
What did the court decide?
Writ Petition dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to approach the concerned authority.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 13.01.2020
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.D. AUDIKESAVALU
W.P. No. 791 of 2020
R. Raghavan ... Petitioner
-vs-
- The Tahsildar, Walajapet Taluk, MBT Road, Opposite to Bus Stand, Ranipettai District – 632 513.
- The Taluk Head Surveyor, Valajapet Taluk Office, MBT Road, Opposite to Bus Stand, Ranipettai District – 632 413. ... Respondents
Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, direct the Respondents to consider the Petitioner Representation dated 02.12.2019 within a stipulate time frame and consequently to direct the Respondents to measure and survey the Petitioner Property and to issue seperate patta in the name of Petitioner after effected subdivision in Joint Patta No.308 in S.No.381/5A1 measuring about to an extent of 5 cents out of 10 cents situated at Chengalnatham Madura Rampuram Village, Walajapet Taluk, Ranipettai District.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
R. Raghavan
- respondent
The Tahsildar, Walajapet Taluk
- respondent
The Taluk Head Surveyor, Valajapet Taluk Office
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court