A writ petition seeking separate Patta and police protection for land survey was dismissed as withdrawn by the petitioner with liberty to approach the concerned authority again.
Writ Petition dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to make fresh application to the concerned authority.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 13.01.2020
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.D. AUDIKESAVALU
W.P. No. 787 of 2020
Venkateshwara Babu ... Petitioner
-vs-
For Petitioner : Mr. P. Rajesh
For Respondents: Mr. Annai Ezhil
Government Advocate (for R1 to R3)
O R D E R
When it is pointed out by the Learned Government Advocate appearing for the First to Third Respondents that the Petitioner had not submitted any representation dated 29.12.2019 to the First and Second Respondents as claimed and even the postal
acknowledgement in the typed-set only relates to the Third Respondent, who cannot issue patta, Learned Counsel for the Petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the Writ Petition with liberty to the Petitioner to make fresh application to the concerned authority and work out his remedy in that regard and he has made an endorsement to that effect, which is recorded.
s/d-
Assistant Registrar
True Copy
Sub-Assistant Registrar
vjt/arb
To
+1 CC to Govt. Pleader sr 3499.
W.P. No. 787 of 2020
VSNII(CO) SP(06/02/2020)
Venkateshwara Babu
Revenue Divisional Officer, Mayiladuthurai
Tahsildar, Kutthalam Taluk
Inspector of Police, Kutthalam Police Station
Saravanan
Senthil
P. D. Audikeshavalu
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
